The other day I picked up a copy of Malcolm Gladwell’s newest book, Outliers: The Story of Success. I’m only a third of the way through the book, but here’s my take on what I have read so far.

Gladwell believes that success is more than just “pulling oneself up by their bootstraps.” He tells the story of Bill Gates and that the real reason for his success was that his private school (Gates came from a well-off family) purchased a computer before computers were widely-used and that Gates was naturally drawn to it. In other words, had Gates gone to a different school, I might not be typing this blog post because computer software might not exist as it does today. In other words, circumstances matter.

The problem I have with the book is that Gladwell seems to take the approach that success is simply too hard for the poor to achieve. Yes, I’ll admit that it would be harder for a poor person to achieve success in life but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible. I think half the battle in achieving anything is mindset. If a person or class of people is constantly told they CAN’T do something, they end up believing it.

How would I level the playing field? My solution:

1. Allow parents vouchers so that they can send their kids to any school they desire. Not all parents would take advantage but some would.

2. Reinforce education and the importance of reading. Enlist the help of ‘famous’ athletes and musicians to get the message out to kids and PARENTS that EDUCATION IS IMPORTANT! Promote libraries and reading clubs. Offer reading classes to parents.

3. Don’t pass kids if they don’t make the grade.

4. Stop glorifying trash and stop filling our kids’ heads with hatred. Show kids how to respect themselves and those around them.

5. Require kids to watch The Big Idea.

Like I said, I’m not through reading Gladwell’s book yet. I don’t agree with some of his thoughts but I do like his style. There aren’t a lot of non-fiction books out there that are enjoyable to read.

GIVEAWAY

If you’d like a chance to win a copy of the book from me, leave a comment below explaining your thoughts on success. I’m going to make this my FIRST EVER subjective giveaway in that I am going to pick my favorite comment (and the comment doesn’t have to agree with me!) and the winner will receive a copy of the book. The deadline for entry is Friday, December 12, 9am CST. Just remember my rule:

1. you must be a resident of the U.S. or Canada (I won’t mail internationally).

ShareThis

We’re nearly midway through December already. That means 2009 is just around the corner. In the spirit of the new year, I’d like to ask:

What are your 2009 Financial Goals?

Here are mine in order of importance:

1. MAX OUT my wife’s 401(k). We haven’t maxed out her 401(k) in years. The market’s down so it’s the PERFECT time to get back into the habit. The IRS raised the employee contribution limit to $16,500 for 2009. My wife gets paid twice a month so that means she will be contributing $687.50 per paycheck. Wowza!

On top of that, she’ll also get a generous employer-match of 75% of the first 6%, or 4.50%. The employer-match should easily put her over the $20,000 contribution mark for the year (and maybe even closer to $25,000 if we get profit-sharing).

2. Recommit to our budget. I know, I know,…we should already be doing this. However, I got kind of lazy and complacent and haven’t stuck to our budget. We make decent money so it’s really silly of us not to using our income wisely. We do save money each month but we could do a lot better with some discipline.

3. Continue building up our emergency fund. Our efund is nowhere near where I’d like it to be. So, the third goal for 2009 is to get it to $10,000.

Those are my financial goals. What are yours?

ShareThis

I read somewhere over the weekend a letter to the editor of some newspaper (I can’t for the life of me remember where I read the comment) by a guy who was lamenting the fact that investors get screwed no matter who is president. His letter mentioned that some stocks do well when a Republican is in office and other stocks do well when a Democrat is in office—he just didn’t know which ones.

I have a suggestion:

Buy the index and don’t worry about it.

Yes, we can make more money IF we know which stocks are going to outperform the market. The problem is either WE DON’T KNOW or it’s hard to know. Therefore, buying the index is the prudent way to go because you don’t have to worry about picking stocks (unless that’s something you love doing).

ShareThis

Check out this letter to the editor that was in today’s Wall Street Journal:

In your Dec. 1 editorial “Messing With Malpractice Reform,” you urge the Illinois Supreme Court to “side with the patients and the rule of law” in considering a case that could overturn the state’s cap on damage awards. Yet the editorial never mentions the patient who is at the center of that case.

She is a three-year-old little girl named Abigaile LeBron, whose life has been forever changed by the severe brain damage she suffered as a result of medical negligence. It is likely that Abigaile will have to be fed through a tube for the rest of her life. She will never develop cognitively or physically as her peers do. And she will likely never live independently. It is inarguably a very painful tragedy for Abigaile and all who know and love her.

The insurance industry and its brethren in the tort reform world have argued that Abigaile’s compensation for lifelong disability, pain and suffering should be arbitrarily limited, despite what a jury of average citizens may decide. The question before the Illinois Supreme Court is whether the Illinois Constitution allows Abigaile’s rights to be limited in this fashion to the benefit of insurance company profits. Twice before, our state’s highest court has decided in favor of patients and against the insurance companies that would limit these rights to protect their own profits. No new arguments have been offered by the insurance industry.

You argue that a reduction in malpractice premiums and the return of doctors to the state have resulted from the law containing caps. Nothing could be further from the truth. Not one case has been litigated under the new cap in Illinois. The simple fact is that those positive developments have resulted from strong, long-suppressed insurance reforms in the legislation. That law has now forced malpractice insurance companies to provide greater transparency on rate-setting and payouts that has in turn spurred competition, motivated more companies to enter the marketplace, and lowered premiums for doctors. Important to the discussion for your readers is the additional fact that Illinois’ largest malpractice insurer has reported that payouts have remained flat for the past 13 years. By the way, it’s the same insurance carrier that admitted during the run-up to this legislation in 2005 that capping awards would not guarantee lower premiums for its doctors.

The Illinois Constitution was put in place to ensure individual rights and freedoms. While corporations and profit-hungry executives often stack the decks against individuals in the marketplace and the halls of government, the courtroom can still provide all parties with a level playing field. The Illinois Supreme Court will now decide whether that standard remains in place for patients like Abigaile LeBron. You should let it do its job.

Philip Harnett Corboy Jr.
President
Illinois Trial Lawyers Association
Chicago

Here’s the problem I have with juries being able to award money damages:

They have no concept of how much money they are awarding. It’s not their money so why not be a cheerful giver?

I’m not saying that what happened to the little girl in the editorial isn’t a tragedy. It is.

I just think it would be nice for lawyers to stop hiding behind the sad stories, be honest and say, “I don’t like tort reform because it severely limits how much money I can make!” It’s silly to talk about “greedy” insurance companies when the lawyer gets a nice percentage of the winnings.

ShareThis

Below is an email interview with Brent Kessel, author of It’s Not About the Money: Unlock Your Money Type to Achieve Spiritual and Financial Abundance*, a book that I reviewed earlier this week.

Why did you decide to write a book?

Without wanting to sound cliché, I never really feel like a made the decision. I had observed so many people suffering around financial issues, and barking up the wrong tree, as it were, that I felt compelled to write it. It was one of the easiest things I?ve ever done professionally.

What do you think is the number one reason people fail financially?

They don?t understand what payoff their financial habits are giving them. If they?re chronic overspenders, there?s a need that their purchases are filling, an emotional need, and buying purses or cars or new furniture allows them to feel good about themselves for some time. In order to change the financial habit, they have to replace the payoff with some other payoff that fills the same need. But most people never question what?s motivating their financial habits.

You say in your book that the ideal person would be balanced among the eight financial archetypes. How do you recommend a person obtain that balance?

It?s very difficult work, but very rewarding. It?s very hard to answer this question in a generalized way, which is why there are about 60 highly customized exercises in the book, so that each archetype can create the balance that they need. One way to say it, is that we often need to cultivate the positive attributes of the archetype which is most dormant in us. So for me, that?s mostly been the Innocent. Being willing to have faith and trust that things will work out, without putting quite so much focus on the numbers, given that I?m a Guardian/Saver/Empire Builder predominantly.

Which of the eight archetypes do you think is most prevalent in today?s society?

Pleasure Seeker and Innocent were prevalent until Summer 2008, which is why we?re in this mess. Today, it?s much more Guardian and Saver. People seem to be returning to the values of the ?30?s ? 50?s, but we?ll see how long that lasts.

How do you explain the archetypes to your clients?

I usually don?t. This is part of why I wrote the book, so that they could read the complete story about each archetype in there. As an example, I?ll more intuitively give a client ?homework? to spend more money on things which bring sensory pleasure, in the case of an overly frugal Saver, or have an Innocent hire a bookkeeper or sign up for an internet-based service like mint.com which shows them where the money?s all going.

What is the typical response from your clients once they learn about the different archetypes?

?Wow, I had no idea you had me so pegged.?

Do you ever have clients who deny the findings?

?Not really. The most I?ve had is someone who felt they couldn?t find themselves in any of them, which is usually a sign of the Innocent. Some people feel that they?re a balance of many, or that it?s constantly changing. Both of these are good signs.?

Once you know a client?s financial archetype, how do you cater your financial advice to fit the archetype?

Again, this is very customized. The Appendix of the book has specific financial planning recommendations tailored to each archetype, and it?s many pages, so it?s hard to summarize. But one example might be to have a Pleasure Seeker sell their vacation home and art collection and deploy that money in more income-producing assets (which don?t produce sensory pleasure), like stocks, bonds, or income properties.

Since writing the book, do you find yourself trying to figure out the archetypes of the people you meet?

Sometimes. It?s mostly intuitive though. If you go to my first MSN story, there?s a video of me walking around Central Park interviewing people and guessing their archetypes. Kind of humorous. The other stories there may give you some good blogging ideas too.

Finally, is it natural for a person?s archetype to change over the years or do people tend to stay the same throughout their lifetimes?

The healthiest people I?ve met with money are able to express different ones at different times. But there?s a whole class of people who, especially when the going gets tough, go back to their tried and true archetypes. Financial habits are hard to break, because unless we very intentionally try to cultivate those which have been dormant, they?ll stay dormant.

Thanks, Brent!

Also, I want to go ahead and announce the winner of the “It’s Not About the Money” book giveaway. There were forty-nine entries and the randomly-selected winner was commenter #31, Walter. Congrats, Walter. I hope you enjoy your book!

I have another giveaway coming up soon. Stay tuned…

ShareThis

Oil dropped another $3.12 to $43.67…the lowest level since January 2005.

If someone would have told me back in July that oil was going to be trading in the 40s by the end of the year, I wouldn’t have believed them. It’s simply amazing how quickly things can turn.

Of course the bad side to all this is that now there’s less incentive for finding alternative fuels. I guess all those plans will get put on the back burner until it makes financial sense to go for them.

ShareThis

I don’t usually write much about credit cards here but this is something kind of interesting.

Charles Schwab is offering an unlimited 2% cash back on their Invest First Visa Credit Card*. The 2% reward gets deposited directly into your Schwab One brokerage account. If you can charge most of what you spend on a monthly basis, this could add up to a decent chunk of change.

My wife and I currently use a Wells Fargo cash-back Visa but it is capped at $500 per year. At a 2% reward, that’s $25,000 per year in spending. If you spend more than that, the Schwab card may not be a bad idea. Just don’t carry a balance!

* NOT an affiliate link.

ShareThis

There is so much bad news floating around, so much to be worried or angry or upset about in the world. However there is a lot to be grateful for as well, so I thought I would take a moment and count a few blessings. This may be a bit late, considering Thanksgiving was a week ago, but I suppose it is never a bad time to be grateful.

A few quotes on the subject I have read recently:

“Life isn’t fair, but it’s still good.” - Unknown (to me)

“To be grateful is to recognize the love of God in everything He has given us-and He has given us everything.”-Thomas Merton

Now you may not be religious, but that last quote really struck me when I read it. It reminds me to take the bad with the good, and to appreciate it. It might seem wrong or even stupid to try to appreciate what seems unfair, bad, or even evil, but it is possible - and important. We can learn and grow and change for the better as a result of every experience - be it sickness, recession, job loss, or even death.

I once overheard my mother say that having cancer was a huge blessing. I recoiled, but she explained that it brought our family closer together and made her realize her inner strength. Remembering that comment has always kept me in check when I find myself whining or self-pitying.

Things for which I am grateful:

• Having a job and a regular paycheck; not everyone does right now.
• Not having to worry about where I’ll get my next meal or bath.
• Having the means and time to give to others who need support.
• A large family which supports and uplifts me.
• The freedom and ability to learn and pursue whatever I choose.

Many in our country are struggling, some for the first time, as our economy sags and companies lay people off and wages stagnate. Of course we are all still much better off than many in the world, but is still natural and easy to worry, to complain, to be angry and even scared.

But struggles can bring us together, and they can encourage us remember what’s really important - what matters a lot more than the 401k balance or the big bonus check. I hope as this volatile year comes to an end that we can all find some things to be truly grateful for.

More from Meg at The World of Wealth

ShareThis

I’ve been reading more and more about the threat of deflation. What’s deflation? I can’t find a better definition for it than what’s in the Barron’s Finance and Investment Handbook*:

DEFLATION decline in the prices of goods and services. Deflation is the reverse of inflation; it should not be confused with disinflation, which is a slowing down in the rate of price increases. Generally, the economic effects of deflation are the opposite of those produced by inflation, with two notable exceptions: (1) prices that increase with inflation do not necessarily decrease with deflation—union wage rates, for example; (2) while inflation may or may not stimulate output and employment, marked deflation has always affected both negatively.

In other words, deflation is not a good thing even though price declines sound wonderful to the shopper!

Here’s a great little deflation tutorial if you’re interested: What is Deflation and Why is it Worrisome?

Are we headed for deflation? I have no idea. I think we’ve already seen it in housing and oil prices. Will we see it in other areas? I don’t know. I think it depends on how high unemployment goes.

Nouriel Roubini is expecting stag-deflation (stagnation/recession + deflation)…that doesn’t sound so good.

ShareThis

Could the failure of the “Big 3″ cause a depression?

That’s what a Chrysler executive claims:

“We’re on the brink with the U.S. auto manufacturing industry,” Press told The Associated Press in an interview. “If we have a catastrophic failure of one of these car companies, in this tender environment for the economy, it’s a huge blow. It could trigger a depression.”

I’m not sure about that but I am sure that it’s in this executive’s best interest to paint as bleak of a picture as possible in order to get his bailout. What do you think?

I’m sure failure would not be good. But, as we’ve talked about before, we can’t just give money to the automakers and allow them to carry on business as usual. Big changes need to be made and now is as good a time as any to make those changes. These changes have needed to be made for years but the current crisis really brought them to light.

Please weigh in with your opinion.

ShareThis