Below is an email interview with Brent Kessel, author of It’s Not About the Money: Unlock Your Money Type to Achieve Spiritual and Financial Abundance*, a book that I reviewed earlier this week.

Why did you decide to write a book?

Without wanting to sound cliché, I never really feel like a made the decision. I had observed so many people suffering around financial issues, and barking up the wrong tree, as it were, that I felt compelled to write it. It was one of the easiest things I?ve ever done professionally.

What do you think is the number one reason people fail financially?

They don?t understand what payoff their financial habits are giving them. If they?re chronic overspenders, there?s a need that their purchases are filling, an emotional need, and buying purses or cars or new furniture allows them to feel good about themselves for some time. In order to change the financial habit, they have to replace the payoff with some other payoff that fills the same need. But most people never question what?s motivating their financial habits.

You say in your book that the ideal person would be balanced among the eight financial archetypes. How do you recommend a person obtain that balance?

It?s very difficult work, but very rewarding. It?s very hard to answer this question in a generalized way, which is why there are about 60 highly customized exercises in the book, so that each archetype can create the balance that they need. One way to say it, is that we often need to cultivate the positive attributes of the archetype which is most dormant in us. So for me, that?s mostly been the Innocent. Being willing to have faith and trust that things will work out, without putting quite so much focus on the numbers, given that I?m a Guardian/Saver/Empire Builder predominantly.

Which of the eight archetypes do you think is most prevalent in today?s society?

Pleasure Seeker and Innocent were prevalent until Summer 2008, which is why we?re in this mess. Today, it?s much more Guardian and Saver. People seem to be returning to the values of the ?30?s ? 50?s, but we?ll see how long that lasts.

How do you explain the archetypes to your clients?

I usually don?t. This is part of why I wrote the book, so that they could read the complete story about each archetype in there. As an example, I?ll more intuitively give a client ?homework? to spend more money on things which bring sensory pleasure, in the case of an overly frugal Saver, or have an Innocent hire a bookkeeper or sign up for an internet-based service like mint.com which shows them where the money?s all going.

What is the typical response from your clients once they learn about the different archetypes?

?Wow, I had no idea you had me so pegged.?

Do you ever have clients who deny the findings?

?Not really. The most I?ve had is someone who felt they couldn?t find themselves in any of them, which is usually a sign of the Innocent. Some people feel that they?re a balance of many, or that it?s constantly changing. Both of these are good signs.?

Once you know a client?s financial archetype, how do you cater your financial advice to fit the archetype?

Again, this is very customized. The Appendix of the book has specific financial planning recommendations tailored to each archetype, and it?s many pages, so it?s hard to summarize. But one example might be to have a Pleasure Seeker sell their vacation home and art collection and deploy that money in more income-producing assets (which don?t produce sensory pleasure), like stocks, bonds, or income properties.

Since writing the book, do you find yourself trying to figure out the archetypes of the people you meet?

Sometimes. It?s mostly intuitive though. If you go to my first MSN story, there?s a video of me walking around Central Park interviewing people and guessing their archetypes. Kind of humorous. The other stories there may give you some good blogging ideas too.

Finally, is it natural for a person?s archetype to change over the years or do people tend to stay the same throughout their lifetimes?

The healthiest people I?ve met with money are able to express different ones at different times. But there?s a whole class of people who, especially when the going gets tough, go back to their tried and true archetypes. Financial habits are hard to break, because unless we very intentionally try to cultivate those which have been dormant, they?ll stay dormant.

Thanks, Brent!

Also, I want to go ahead and announce the winner of the “It’s Not About the Money” book giveaway. There were forty-nine entries and the randomly-selected winner was commenter #31, Walter. Congrats, Walter. I hope you enjoy your book!

I have another giveaway coming up soon. Stay tuned…

ShareThis

Today the Senate passed a $300 billion housing rescue bill aimed at turning around the flagging housing market, helping homeowners avoid foreclosure, and propping up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The fact that Senators came in on a Saturday to vote on the bill is an indicator of the importance that Capitol Hill places on the issue.

It remains to be seen who will benefit from this legislation, but one group of folks that surely are breathing a sigh of relief are the shareholders of Fannie and Freddie. It’s unlikely that these two publically traded stocks will return to their previous levels anytime soon, but this intervention at least makes it more unlikely that they’ll go belly-up.

Nationwide, foreclosure rates continue to skyrocket. RealtyTrac yesterday reported that foreclosure activity was up a whopping 14 percent in the second quarter, a rise of 121 percent over the second quarter of 2007.

It is hoped that the passage of this regulation will soothe Wall Street’s frazzled nerves. Oil prices (too high) and housing prices (falling too fast) are surely the two most troubling elements in our fragile economic situation. Both are complex and have deep reaching tentacles. The reassuring thing about the housing picture is that, unlike oil, it is an American market – therefore Congress may have some success in turning the ship. Washington hasn’t produced any legislation on energy– neither to curb speculation nor to increase offshore drilling. Lawmakers take some lumps from the public for their inaction, but it’s probably just as well since neither approach has the potential to improve the situation. The US controls a tiny percentage of global reserves, and traders move a small percentage of barrels traded, which leads us to a troubling conclusion: the U.S. economy is just one piece in the global puzzle, and things that happen outside of our borders are going to hit us in the pocketbook here at home.

But even if we’re struggling with our oil addiction, it’s hopeful that this piece of legislation might help the housing market. Much of the impact may be psychological, however. Democrats estimate that around 400,000 households might benefit from the bill, but last quarter alone saw almost twice that number of foureclosures – around 740,000 according to RealtyTrac. But we can hope that this bill shows that Congress is willing to act if necessary, and that might be enough to get banks lending again. And that might lead to fewer foreclosures, more buyers buying, more sellers selling, a shrinking housing inventory, and eventually a recovery in prices.

With a divorce rate of around 50% and many people not marrying until they are in their thirties, it is surprising to find that there are still many women who aren't financially educated. Most of this can be traced back to two factors: upbringing at home and society. In both cases, boys have often been given much more training and many more resources than girls have and the effects are damaging women financially today as they face a world in which they have to take care of monetary issues on their own but have never developed the skills to do so.

The Safe, Secure 1950's

In the 1950's most women quickly married and settled down to raise families. Very few of them worked outside the home, and finances were handled by the men. It was a financially prosperous time and women were expected to focus on the home and child-rearing. This focus on home-making was passed on to daughters while sons were groomed to the "breadwinners" of the family.

The obvious separation between girls and boys activities also managed to keep girls "sheltered" from financial concerns. They weren't expected to pay for anything on a date and parents didn't often expect them to hold down jobs. Boys, on the other hand, were expected to get a job at a young age, even if it was merely a paper route. The expectation was that a young man needed to "take on some responsibility" and "contribute."

As the generation raised in the 1950's grew up and raised families of their own, they passed on the financial biases that had been instilled in them to their own children. Many of today's parents have made the same mistakes their own mothers and fathers did, ignoring the obvious need for women to understand and learn to handle their own finances in favor of hoping that their daughters wouldn't have to face the harsh financial facts of life.

The belief that men would take care of women's financial needs was so ingrained that many of the "big picture" financial lessons were overlooked. Women tended to learn how to shop for bargains at the grocery store, stretch the budget at the holidays and that was about it. More complex lessons such as long-term investments, retirement planning and stock portfolio development were not a part of the picture.

Boys learned how to manage their money, save for a rainy day, and make smart investments and a host of other financial strategies.

Play and School Contribute to Gender Gap

Interestingly, boys more than girls tend to develop habits that are more geared toward understanding numbers and how they relate to finances from a very young age. While girls tend to be "collectors," says Joline Godfrey, founder of Independent Means, "boys develop informal economies based on relative value from the age of six on while trading cards and other items. By the time boys start trading stocks and bonds, it's just another form of the game." Independent Means is a company which promotes economic independence and growth for girls and women aged 14 to 24.

Even in school settings, boys are rewarded more consistently for being risk-takers, and investing is often perceived as a risky venture. Girls aren't encouraged to take risks and aren't rewarded for these types of behaviors and instead are likely to be cautioned to be careful. When faced with the prospect of learning about investing in the stock market or learning about retirement options, these same girls - now women - are more fearful of making decisions and less sure of themselves in making choices for themselves.

Statistics Show Gender Bias

A recent survey showed some startling discrepancies even today between teenage boys and girls and how much education they have received in the very basics of finance. Some of the findings include:

* Many more teenage boys than girls report understanding of how to write a check and how a credit card works, including accrued interest. * Teenage girls are much more likely to be in debt than boys, with almost 50% reporting credit card debt as opposed to less than a quarter of teen boys having any debt. * Girls are more likely to report that learning about investing is boring, while boys report a real interest in learning about it. When asked to elaborate, girls often pointed out that this wasn't something they would be doing in the future, while boys indicated that it was important to learn so that they could be successful.

The perception that girls shouldn't have to worry about their financial future in the long term (based upon the faulty premise that a man will take care of her or that she can hire a financial consultant to handle all of the boring stuff) is still present in many homes. Fortunately, the balance is beginning to shift as more parents realize that women who are successful in their careers must also be able to guide their own financial futures, not rely on others to do it for them.

Programs Aim at Closing the Gap

Today's girls are more likely to learn how to handle money at a young age. Cautionary tales in the news and on talk shows about women left destitute and the fear that social security can no longer support an individual in their golden years has, perhaps, contributed to this. After all, with most women outliving their spouses and more than half of women divorced, it's likely that today's girls will be supporting themselves in their retirement years - understanding Roth IRAs suddenly becomes very important.

Companies and organizations are also stepping to the forefront with programs designed to educate teens in general and girls in particular. Boys and Girls Clubs of America, in collaboration with Charles Schwab, offer Money Matters: Make It Count programs in cities across the country.

Visa works with Girl Scouts of the USA to provide two resources, the Cashin' In workbook and the Makin' Cents web game, to teach girls aged 13-17 financial responsibility. The web game specifically challenges players to find real-world solutions for characters' financial challenges.

With such programs increasingly popular and the need for women to understand finances now a hot topic, it's to be hoped that this generation of fathers will teach their daughters as much about finance as they teach their sons.

Carrie Carter: Author of: Think Your Way to Riches Kids' Style

For more information or to arrange an interview with Carrie Carter at 810.252.2281 e-mail: carrie114cr@aol.com or visit: www.ThinkYourWayToRichesKidsStyle.com

Carrie's passion is to help people on their inner journey to discover their personal road map for abundance, peace, and happiness. Her main passion is to give children worldwide the "Tools" which are lacking in the normal educational system and understanding to create the abundant lifestyle they are all worthy of. Experience Carrie's educational seminars, workshops, and private life coaching.

About the Author

Carrie's passion is to help people on their inner journey to discover their personal road map for abundance, peace, and happiness. Her main passion is to give children worldwide the "Tools" which are lacking in the normal educational system and understanding to create the abundant lifestyle they are all worthy of. Experience Carrie's educational seminars, workshops, and private life coaching.

When you get engaged, you’re not just promising to marry a person; you’re also marrying their money habits, their debt, and credit history.  If you’re not careful, unknown money issues can not only ruin a marriage but sink you deep into debt.

Hiding Credit Card Debt
Here’s a sad story of a former co-worker whose life was turned upside down by his spouse’s debt.  I met up with him for lunch yesterday to catch up and couldn’t believe the story he had to tell.

His wife had 50K of credit card debt coming into their marriage that she didn’t tell him about until several years after they were married.  She was only making minimum payments so over the years the interest mounted and the debt continued to grow.

He had owned a home prior to the marriage and they finally they decided to tap into it’s equity and take out a loan to pay off most of her debt. A few days later he comes home to find her packing her bags and on her way out the door.  Of course he didn’t share this story with anyone for quite a while since it was so painful and embarrassing but now happily he’s met someone new and is moving on. 

What’s the morale of the story?  Find out about your future spouse’s finances before you get married.  To help you do that, here are some questions to ask, courtesy of Real Simple:

Ten Romantic Debt Questions for Your Fiancé

• Do you use credit cards for everyday expenses?
• Do you pay your credit-card balance in full each month?
• Have you ever maxed out your credit cards?
• How many credit cards do you have?
• What are your debts?
• Have you looked at your credit reports in the last year?
• Did you ever require a cosigner for a loan?
• Have you ever been put into collection by a creditor?
• Are you a cosigner on anyone else’s loan?
• Do you have any tax or other liens pending?

These questions are obviously not very romantic but they’re definitely necessary things to ask.  Depending on your fiancé’s personality you might handle them in different ways.  It might be easiest to just sit down and go through them all straight up or you might have to slip in a carefully worded question here and there during the course of conversation. 

Here are some other finance questions the article suggests asking:

• Do you have a savings or checking account?
• Do you balance your checking account each month?
• Do you do research before making major purchases?
• Do you have a budget or a spending plan?
• Do you track your finances? How often?
• Are you aware of all your benefits at work?
• Do you have life insurance?
• Do you have health insurance?

Of course some of these things you might find out over the course of time as you get to know someone. However you do it, make sure you get these questions answered, I know my friend sure wishes he had.

Checking Their Credit History
If you’re worried that your fiancé is holding back information you could dig a little deeper. Not telling you everything is probably a bad sign for future marital communications but if you’re determined they might be the one you could always do some more research.

If you know their full name, social security number, date of birth, current address, and previous address you can probably pull your future spouse’s credit report to do some double checking.  Be aware checking their credit report without their permission can potentially get you into some trouble:

“Anyone who obtains a copy of someone else’s credit report under false pretenses can be fined substantially and jailed for up to a year.

Only businesses or individuals with a “permissible purpose” can access your credit report. “Permissible purpose” is defined in Section 604 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).“

Then again, if your fiancé is willing to throw you into jail for checking their credit history, probably a sign you don’t want to marry them.

How to Build Credit History
What if your future husband or wife doesn’t have any debt but they don’t have any credit history at all?  This happened to us, when we went to get a loan for our home my wife’s lack of credit history affected the interest rates we were eligible for. 

We ended up putting both our names on the title but only mine on the loan so that we could get a better interest rate but we wanted a way to help build her credit profile.

Our financial planner showed us a pretty slick way that worked wonders for my wife’s credit.  She put $1000 into a 12 month certificate of deposit at our local bank and then used the CD to get a secured loan from the same bank.

We setup our checking account to make automatic payments on the loan so she had a year’s worth of on time loan payments on her credit report. Then after 12 months we took the money out of the CD and paid off the loan.  The interest we had earned on the CD helped pay for most of the interest we had paid on the money we borrowed.

Marriage Money Summary
Get to know your fiancé’s money baggage and habits or they may come back to make you miserable, divorced, and in debt in the future.

Al Gores whole basic theory is based on the LIE that CO2 causes global tempertures to rise.

Are record cold temperatures an indication of global cooling or a new ice age? NO

Are record cold temperatures an indication of global cooling or a new ice age? NO.

Fact: Carbon Dioxide levels in the atmosphere are at a record high, not just in human history, but in the geological record for the last 600,000 years Is this increased carbon dioxide the result of human activity? Almost certainly. We are digging up coal and pumping up oil that was buried over hundreds of millions of years. We are dumping the spent products of combustion into the atmosphere pretty quickly. Before we have exhausted the world's supply of coal and oil, we will raise carbon dioxide even higher.

Fact: Carbon Dioxide levels and global ice volume are inversely proportional in the geological record for the last 400,000 years.

Does Carbon Dioxide itself cause temperature to rise?

That is the popular theory. There is no appearent correlation between carbon dioxide and global temperature in longer term studies for the last 500,000,000 years (Nir J. Shaviv, Ján Veizer, "Celestial driver of Phanerozoic climate?" Geological Society of America Today 13:7 July 2003 p4-10). Actual temperature increase, measured by methods that may be tainted by the Urban Heat Island Effect, still show an increase less than 0.5C since 1880. While carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere has gone up continuously for more than 100 years, average global temperatures have risen as well as fallen during that period.

The drop in carbon dioxide levels observed during the ice ages may have caused the ice age, may be caused by the ice age or both may have a common cause, but are otherwise unrelated. Scientific analysis of the correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide indicate that rising temperatures PRECEDE carbon dioxide increases by about 800 years, suggesting that temperature causes carbon dioxide to rise, which is not the position of global warming theorists. (Caillon et al, "Timing of Atmospheric CO and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III", Science v299, March 2003, p1728-1731).

Global Temperature changes correspond more accurately to changes in solar activity than they do to the continuous rise in carbon dioxide during the last hundred years. (Friis-Christensen et al, "Length of the solar cycle: An indicator of solar activity closely associated with climate", Science, v254, 1991, p698-700) There is some evidence these data sets have begun to diverge in recent years, but the data is only published on the internet, not in scientific review journals. Current scientific data cannot be easily interpreted to portend global warming. Mathematical models can be constructed to project future temperature changes many different ways, but those mathematical models projecting large increases are considered "realistic" while straight line projections (which aren't very scary) are not popular, possibly because they are not exciting.

Is increased carbon dioxide bad for the environment if it has no effect on global temperature? No.

Carbon dioxide is a necessary nutrient that plants depend upon. Carbon Dioxide levels many times higher than current levels on earth improve plant growth and vitality. A significant portion of the increased farming productivity observed during the last 50 years may not be due to pestisides or improved techniques, but to the increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. (Sherwood B. Idso, Bruce A. Kimball, "Tree Growth in Carbon Dioxide Enriched Air and Its Implications for Global Carbon Cycling and Maximum Levels of Atmospheric CO2," Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(1993):3:537-555, p. 537-5380)

Is increased temperature bad for the earth?

In and of itself, temperature increase would not be bad. Longer growing seasons and increases in arable land would improve crop yields even more and increase the earths sustainable population. In the 1970s, when a broad consensus of scientific opinion and projections suggested the earth was rapidly cooling, mass-starvation was a cause for worry, but global warming would not have that particular effect.

For the non-human population of the earth, over hundreds or thousands of years global warming would change the viablility of species. Plants and animals would migrate, adapt or become extinct. Would it be worse, i.e. more deadly, than the ice ages that have fallen over the whole earth 4 times in the last 400,000 years? That would depend on the quickness with which the climate changes.

Global sealevels have been rising continuously for several centuries at a rate of 1-2mm per year. An acceleration of the rise in global sealevels would have a more significant effect than slower rates, but coastal cities will be forced to change with the times either way. Sea levels 18,000 years ago were 100 meters lower than they are today. Sea level has risen an average of 5.6mm per year for the last 18,000 years, so we are actually in a rather slow period geologically as far as sea level changes. During the "Little Ice Age" of 1650 to 1850, the rate of sea level rise was virtually halted, but we have now moved back into a relatively warmer period and sea levels are rising once again, but not yet at thier historical clip. About 3.5 million years ago, sea levels were around 30 meters higher than today.

The earth will change and we will change with it. Some of the changes we may cause, but other changes will be out of our hands. Change is not necessarily good or bad. Slow change is inevitable. The earth can adapt and so can we.

About the Author

Steve Johnson is writes on a large variety of subjects and topics. Currently Steve is involved in The Truth About Iraq

As I mentioned on Monday, May brought the highest numbers of visitors this site has seen so far.  I decided to take a look at what people were most interested in over the course of the month.

Tracking your stimulus check was the most popular article, there must be a lot of people waiting to get their rebate money.

Gas prices are obviously on everyone’s mind, the topics of riding the bus to save gas money, different ways to save gas money commuting to work, and the best gas credit cards were popular with readers as well.

The series on personal finance issues for college graduates has garnered alot of interest from former college students entering the working world for the first time this summer.

People are getting ready for their summer trips and have found the saving money on vacation series useful in making their preparations.  This one is only partially complete with several more articles on the topic coming up soon.

With high gas prices, people must be looking for more in home entertainment. Saving money on online movie rentals with a free trial of Blockbuster Total Access was another popular one for the month.

Here are some of the more popular articles from The Money Writers during the month of May:

• Investing in the Stock Market Over the Past 10 Years: How Did Dollar-Cost Averaging Fare?
• how to make money without a job and why you should
• Frugal Tips I Can’t (or Won’t) Do
• Save Money on Gas Tips from Consumer Reports
• The Future of Personal Finance Tools
• Is Investing In Rental Property A Good Move?
• Why your Retirement Account is NOT an Emergency Fund

Those who run real estate investment clubs have a big challenge in lining up speakers for each meeting.  Clubs do not usually have the kind of budget that would allow them to pay for speakers, therefore they need to do their best to locate those that will speak for free.  This invariably results in the talk being given by someone who has a specific agenda or something to sell.  This is not necessarily a bad thing, you just need to keep the speakers ultimate motivation in mind when you listen to the spiel.

Some of these speakers are quite good and their knowledge is obvious.  On the other hand, some of the speakers leave you scratching your head and wondering if they have ever owned an investment property.  Investing veterans have little difficulty in separating the fakes from those who are the real deal.  Novice investors may mistakenly assume that if someone is speaking to a group he must know something.  Hopefully they will learn before they are burned by one of these phonies. 

 My primary purpose for attending monthly club meetings is for the networking and resulting connections ( see: Getting the Most From Your Real Estate Club ), however I do enjoy hearing from good presenters. My local real estate club had two very well qualified speakers at a couple of recent meetings.  While both were very obviously qualified to speak about real estate investing, their styles and agendas were a world apart.  

 Guru #1

At our May 2008 club meeting we had a speaker who specialized in foreclosures.  Certainly a timely topic and on that I was looking to learn more about.  I had seen this speaker once before and knew that he was a good presenter and very knowledgeable.  After introducing himself and providing his background, he openly stated his agenda.  He was not there to sell books, tapes or home-study courses, in fact he didn’t have any of that.  The business model for his company was to purchase bank REO (foreclosures) properties in bulk.  He then sold these properties as-is or after light rehab to investors at wholesale prices.  To do that he needed two things, properties to buy from banks and investors to sell them to.

What he was pitching was a two day seminar on how to locate, buy and finance the acquisition of these properties.  He was charging $1800 for the seminar with the guarantee that he would refund your money after the first day if you didn’t feel it was worth it.  He then proceeded to spend the next hour sharing some of his knowledge of the subject.  He was truly impressive and it was a great example of what you would get in his workshop.  He had over twenty people sign up and most of them were veteran investors who are not easily impressed.

 Guru #2

At our most recent club meeting we had another speaker with impressive credentials.  He is currently featured on one the house flipping shows and has a real estate company on the east coast.  The club heavily promoted the meeting because they do not usually have a name speaker and the resulting attendance was much larger than normal.  Many of the regular meeting segments were cut short to allow this speaker to have as much time as possible.

This speaker had an array of tapes and course material displayed, so his agenda was obvious to anyone who was paying attention.  He began his talk with his background in real estate and talked about all of the mistakes he made when he began.  He kept telling us that he was going to teach us how to do this, that, and the other thing during his talk.  I kept waiting for him to actually “teach” something but all he really did was talk about what he was going to tell us.

As the talk progressed it was laced with sales pitches for a computer program, home-study courses and his five-day boot camp.  Some of the pitches were very subtle while others were blatant commercials.  After 90 minutes he closed with a final pitch for his boot camp.  The regular price was $5,000, but is you signed up now it was only $2,497.  But wait, there’s more! He would include a $500 credit for your travel expenses and the first few people to sign up would receive the $2,000 computer program for $1!

A handful of people did sign up.  From what I saw they were newcomers to the club or novice investors.  None of the veterans were impressed enough to part with their cash. 

The Bottom Line

Both of the gurus were qualified to speak about real estate.  However their value was very different.  One was geared to marketing courses and boot camps to novice investors.  Those who sign up would most likely gain valuable knowledge, but would it really be worth the price?  The second guru was targeting experienced investors with a desire to participate in the foreclosure market.  I spoke to several of the attendees who agreed that there was definite value, but it was not for everyone.

If you are ever inclined to sign up for some gurus course, do so with your eyes wide open.  Is the course geared to someone with your level of experience?  What do you hope to gain from the seminar or boot camp?  Will you be able to implement what you learn or are you just falling for a sales pitch from a smooth-talking speaker? Buyer beware.

The great difficulty in education is to get experience out of ideas.
George Santayana

This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

A Tale of Two Real Estate Gurus

Well we're a few weeks beyond Hurricane Ike, and our collective attention has turned from tropical storms to financial ones - a topic that I'll write about shortly. 

Most of Houston is back to normal.  Among the properties that I own we suffered a few downed fences and an uprooted tree or two, along with a tenant who appears to have disappeared and abandoned her lease (I'll write about that as well).  All and all I've been pretty lucky - and thanks to those of you who sent your best wishes. 

But take a look at the JPMorganChase tower in Downtown Houston.  Looks like they've cornered the local plywood market. 

Investing for retirement is one of the staples of financial planning. Almost everyone will either choose to, or be forced to stop working at some point, and having money set aside to fund these non-working years is important. In addition to retirement, there is an increasing trend in saving and investing for college expenses. College tuition is increasing rapidly, and many parents are looking to provide some relief so their children aren’t burdened with tens of thousands of dollars of student loan debt after graduation. With the creation of Section 529 plans, more people are aggressively saving money for college, and now have the opportunity to not only receive tax breaks for doing so, but they can put this money to work with various investments. But with these options and benefits come some drawbacks and things to watch out for.

Understanding Time Frame

One of the greatest factors that determine how you should be invested has to do with time frame, or time horizon. Knowing how long your money has to grow will largely dictate what type of investments you choose. But when it comes to investing for retirement versus college, while it appears simple, there is more to consider than looking at how many years you have left.

With retirement, most people have a lot more flexibility. For one, retirement age comes at different times for different people. Some retire in their 50s, while others work into their 70s. So, just because you’re 30 years old and expect to retire at 65, that means you have roughly 35 years, but it also means there is flexibility. Who knows what will happen over this time, you may retire early, you may be forced to work longer, or you may change careers. Whatever the case, you have the flexibility to take on some risk with your investments.

Looking at college savings, there is much less flexibility and the time frame is more rigid. If you have a child, you know that from birth, you have roughly 18 years until college. On top of that, you know that once they enter college, they probably have around 4 years in which they need to withdraw funds from the account. Sure, some children might get scholarships and not need the money, others might wait a year or two before attending college, or some might go on to earn a graduate degree. But for the most part, there is a fairly specific time frame at work which can limit the amount of risk you’re willing to take.

Why This Affects Investment Decisions

With 18 years of growth, and about four years of withdrawals, most people would see no problem with investing fairly aggressively, especially in the early years. This is to be expected, because stocks generally do produce high returns, and with that much time for the money to grow, you can weather the ups and downs. Even so, when you go back to the flexibility of extending your time horizon or putting off withdrawals, you really don’t have that as a luxury when it comes to college savings. What happens when your child is ready to head off to college and your account is down, are you going to tell them they have to wait a few years before they can start college so your investments can recover? Of course not. And if you wait too long, your window for using that money without taxes and penalties may be gone. You’ll likely have to settle for selling at a loss and maybe even foot more of the tuition bill yourself.

As you can see, even though there is more certainty in regards to how much money you’ll need, what tuition will cost, and knowing exactly how long you have to invest, it doesn’t remove any of the risk. While retirement may yield many unknowns, you at least have options in which you can plan for, and structure your retirement to make everything work.

You also have to consider the withdrawal phase. Like I mentioned above, for most people, withdrawing funds from a college savings plan will take place over a relatively short amount of time. But when you look at retirement, the withdrawal phase can span 20 or 30 years. This allows you to remain invested, at least in part, in stocks even while in retirement because you have another few decades in which you are slowly withdrawing the funds. With college, again, you need to depend on that money over just four or five years on average, so the need to safeguard those funds leading up to, and once the child is in college is very important.

How to Invest Your College Savings

When it comes to investing for college, many of the same rules apply as investing for retirement. But what really changes is the amount of time you spend in each investment phase, and ramping up to a more conservative portfolio earlier. To see why, just take a look at what the past 10 years has shown us. Over the past 10 years, the S&P has a negative annualized return. 10 years may account for half, or even more of your entire time to save for college. That could have a significant impact on how much money you are able to accumulate. So, here are some guidelines:

Birth to Age 5: Just like someone that’s just starting to save for retirement, it’s a good time to be investing in stocks. At this point, a diversified portfolio in stocks would be fine. You’d probably focus on primarily holding domestic large-cap stocks while rounding it out with some international and small or mid-cap offerings.

Age 5 to 10: At this point, you’ll already want to start getting a little more conservative. You’d probably want to think about a 70% mix of stocks and and 30% in bonds. You’ll want to stay diversified across the spectrum of stocks, and probably focus on something like intermediate term bonds.

Age 10 to 15: By now, you’ve crossed the halfway point if you’ve been investing since birth, so it’s time to ratchet things down a bit further. A 50/50 mix of stocks and bonds is going to be the name of the game for the next few years. You’d want to still keep a broad diversification of stocks, but you’ll also want to add some higher quality bond holdings. Of the bond portion, you’ll probably want to keep half of it in low-risk areas like a money market or fixed account.

Age 15 to 18: As you approach the home stretch, you want to make sure that any sudden market declines won’t completely drain your account since your child will be starting college in just a couple years. Three years isn’t enough time to rely too heavily on market conditions, so you will probably want to rely on a 75% allocation of bonds, and 25% in stocks. Now, you should begin to focus a little more on safer, income producing stocks, and shift towards more high-quality bonds. Remember, since you need the money in just a few years, you’d rather have a meager 5% gain than a 5% loss each year heading into college.

Age 18+: Your child is probably ready to start college, and that means the first tuition bills are due. Now is not a time for surprises, so you should be focused on generating predictable income from your investments. At this point, your investments are more or less a savings account that will regularly be tapped into. So, most, if not all of your investments will be in very safe things like money markets or fixed accounts. It’s still fine to keep a little money in the stock market to try and keep up with or beat inflation, but you probably don’t want more than 10% at risk.

Keep in mind that these are just guidelines, and by no means absolute terms. Economic conditions, interest rates, and the number of children you have and what their goals are will largely dictate exactly how you invest. But, this is a good starting point. If you’re able to begin saving and investing right from birth, that’s great. But keep in mind that if you don’t start until your child is older, it can be like playing with fire if you try to accelerate your returns by being more aggressive. Remember, just one or two bad years of returns could wipe out a year’s worth of tuition, and you have a limited amount of time to recover.

I’ve been meeting with a lot of people lately who started saving for their child’s college in just the past few years, and they have 15 year olds while they are invested entirely in stocks. It’s certainly not very fun to see your college fund cut in half in just a year when your child has just a few years to go until needing the money. So, it pays to be a little more conservative, especially in the remaining five or so years leading up to college so there aren’t any surprises.

Investing for College Requires a Slightly Different Approach Compared to Investing for Retirement

The Motley Fool is a web site devoted to helping average people make better investment and financial decisions. Recently, GRS forum administrator (and resident economist) Jericho Hill got a chance to visit The Motley Fool headquarters. This is part two of a report on his experience. (Here’s part one.)

When I was in high school, I participated in my state?s stock market game. It was designed to introduce our economics class to the world of investing. That?s where I first heard of The Motley Fool, an upstart website for financial investors that went against the grain of having advisors manage your money. Their newsletter analyzed the advantages of managing your investments yourself, and advocated indexed mutual funds over managed funds.

So, when I received an invitation recently to visit the Fool Headquarters in Alexandria, VA for a focus group, I jumped at the chance. The purpose of the focus group was two-fold.

• One part of the meeting focused on The Motley Fool?s free CAPS service, a community stock-picking tool. I discussed this experience last week.
• The second part of the focus group dealt with how the participants used financial information, where they got it from, and what our views on investing were.

It was the second part of the meeting that I felt was the most valuable. Along with various Motley Fool staffers, the group members spoke about their personal investing habits, beliefs, thoughts, and attitudes. We heard from people ranging from first-time investors saving for retirement, to a professional financial planner, to well, myself. The breadth and depth of perspective was illuminating.

Prior to the focus group, I had walked around the office floor and noticed quite a few quotes on the walls. One by Peter Lynch read ?Never invest in any idea you can?t illustrate with a crayon.? Another said ?Though it?s easy to forget sometimes, a share is not a lottery ticket, its part ownership in a business.?

Later, during the group discussion, another quote came up by Warren Buffett: ?If you have one or two great ideas a year, you?re doing great.? The two new investors in the room stated that they felt pressure to succeed and succeed often as they started to invest for retirement. Knowing there were resources that played on the psychology of investing rather than mathematics of investing was important to those attendees. They also didn?t know where the best sources of information were, or who to follow.

Many of those in the room felt that it was not prudent to follow one particular author or person. Rather, it was the subject matter that as important, and as Burton Malkiel said ?Investors should act like intelligence agencies, gathering information no matter how seemingly insignificant.?

Somewhere during the conversation, I brought up the problem of risk. Individuals have different risk profiles, just as some people can ride very scary roller coasters while I?m stuck on the Dahlonega Mine Train ride at Six Flags. Further, not only do we handle risk differently, but another attendee pointed out that we even define risk differently. Our group took five minutes to write individual definitions of risk. They were all different when we reconvened.

We had a long discussion about risk, and about how our differing views on risk can make conversations on financial topics difficult. Different risk tolerances create difficulties in determining just what one?s best financial plan is. How does one define risk? More importantly, how do you define risk? All agreed that becoming more comfortable with one element of risk (volatility) was exceptionally important to being a successful long-term investor.

When the focus group ended, there was no general consensus on what information we should consume, to whom we should listen, where we should invest, or even how we should invest. That seems like a profound thought to me: that your best personal finance advisor is yourself, regardless of whether you?re just starting out or finishing up.

Jericho Hill also recently had a chance to speak with David Gardner, one of the founders of The Motley Fool. Look for excerpts from that interview at Get Rich Slowly in the future.

---
Related Articles at Get Rich Slowly:

• Picking Stocks with The Motley Fool’s CAPS
• How to Get Out of Debt
• links for 2007-05-16
• How to Obtain Your Free Credit Report
• Daily Roundup: Money Myths, Going Organic, and DIY Halloween Calendar

Buy books that are used. Most are in good condition. You’re buying the book for the words so don’t worry that the spine is a little bent or the pages are a bit folded. I just bought a $35 dollar book on Amazon.com for $15 bucks used.

Some people are irked by buying books used. They’re afraid that the previous owner had abused and neglected their book before putting it on the market. Rest assured: They’re nothing wrong with most used books. The previous owner is selling it because they need the money. Or they do what I do and buy books and then not read them.

[Photo Credit]

Sponsor: Parlayer - Henry and Matt blog about sports and stuff.

ShareThis

I guess by now nobody cares if I am around … so this would be just to motivate myself to write a little more.

Looks like the site was down for a couple of months after some screwup with Wordpress/Hostmonster/Upgrade/That-Kind-of-Crap; so it took quite some efforts to get it back on track. Now, it looks all messed up so it will be a while before it looks pretty again.

Hoping to see some old friends again.

FNBO Direct Provides Great Rates and Great Service

With interest rates continuing to be slashed across the board, finding attractive yields on savings accounts is becoming even more difficult. At the very least, you’d like to have your savings try to keep up with inflation, but even that can be a tall order these days. Of course, interest rates aren’t everything, and you also want a bank that is secure, provides great service, and has a useful online interface. Luckily, FNBO Direct is a great opportunity to receive a competitive interest rate, remain FDIC insured, and have access to a pretty nice online interface.

FNBO Account Features

• No account minimum
• 3.25% APY as of this writing
• FDIC insured

Just like opening an account with most online, or even traditional banks, you will need to provide some information in order to sign up, verify your identity, and link to other existing accounts. To open an account with FNBO Direct, you’ll need:

• Your Social Security or Tax ID Number.
• Your Driver?s License or ID card issued by a state DMV.
• Employer information.
• Information about any loans or mortgages that you may have to help us confirm your identity.
• For instant funding, you will need your current bank account and routing numbers.
• If a joint account, the other applicant’s information.

Sign Up Today

There are obviously a lot of choices when it comes to savings accounts, but with rates continuing to decline, making sure your money is working its hardest is increasingly important. While I’m not a big fan of rate chasing, I think FNBO Direct is a good place to stick it out. In the past, they have been one of the last banks to drop rates when it was time for a rate cut, and the rates are consistently at the higher end of the spectrum. So, sign up today for your own FNBO Direct account.

FNBO Direct Savings Account Review - High-Yield Savings at 3.25%

We’re nearly midway through December already. That means 2009 is just around the corner. In the spirit of the new year, I’d like to ask:

What are your 2009 Financial Goals?

Here are mine in order of importance:

1. MAX OUT my wife’s 401(k). We haven’t maxed out her 401(k) in years. The market’s down so it’s the PERFECT time to get back into the habit. The IRS raised the employee contribution limit to $16,500 for 2009. My wife gets paid twice a month so that means she will be contributing $687.50 per paycheck. Wowza!

On top of that, she’ll also get a generous employer-match of 75% of the first 6%, or 4.50%. The employer-match should easily put her over the $20,000 contribution mark for the year (and maybe even closer to $25,000 if we get profit-sharing).

2. Recommit to our budget. I know, I know,…we should already be doing this. However, I got kind of lazy and complacent and haven’t stuck to our budget. We make decent money so it’s really silly of us not to using our income wisely. We do save money each month but we could do a lot better with some discipline.

3. Continue building up our emergency fund. Our efund is nowhere near where I’d like it to be. So, the third goal for 2009 is to get it to $10,000.

Those are my financial goals. What are yours?

ShareThis

My wife has wanted to move into town for quite some time so that she can be a little closer to friends and to our other activities.  I’ve been reluctant to move for a few reasons.  First, I think if we bought now, it would be like trying to catch a falling knife.  Second, it would be a longer drive to work for me.  Third, I don’t like change.  (None of these are her fault. )

And just as much as I feel pressured when my wife tells me about a good house that’s come up for sale, she probably feels frustrated by my reluctance to take any serious action on it because “this is just the beginning of the downturn” and “there will be more, and better, deals later.”

Actually, regardless of how far I feel the housing market is going to go down, I don’t really know.  I can get warm fuzzies that it’s getting to be more of a buyer’s market, but I won’t really know until I start tracking home prices.  Tracking prices is pretty straightforward, and has some advantages:

• It’s easier to recognize a deal when it comes along.  There is a huge amount of information literally a mouse click away, and tracking the price of desirable houses over time shows clearly what these houses were being offered at.  Rather than sensing that a house is a good deal, I can see that it is.
• It’s active.  It’s searching with a purpose.  It’s still basically window shopping, but I know which stores I’m going to. 
• It’s focused.  We’re looking for a house to move into.  This narrows our search and makes it more time-effective.

Here’s how we’re going about it now:

1. I signed up for an account at Realtor.com.  This allows me to save searches — and have daily or weekly e-mails sent to me — filtered by ZIP code, price, number of bedrooms, etc.
2. Since my wife is pickier (!) she chose the acceptable candidates among the few dozen houses that met the search criteria that Realtor.com allowed.  We could have fewer results to go through if we filtered by square footage, but not all of the listings include a square footage.  So, we pile through some more listings but turn up a few more candidates.  We eliminate most split foyers since she really doesn’t like those.
3. We build up a spreadsheet with the following columns:  ZIP Code, Address (to identify the house), Subdivision, Bedrooms, Bathrooms, Square Footage, Basement (no, yes, or split level), Garage (no, one-car, or two-car), and Asking Price.  We make one row per house, and add columns at the end to track the asking price over time.  We also list the houses that meet the search criteria but don’t meet our criteria so that we don’t have to re-visit those listings each week.  The columns are the criteria that are important to us; if you do this, you may have other columns you want to consider.
4. Houses keep getting prices added as long as they’re listed.  If they’re taken off, then we keep them to see if they come back on again.
5. Later we may add houses listed for auction or on other services, since some sellers are going the route of national real estate listing without the commissions.

Here are some of the measurements that can be done from these numbers:

• Number of listings.  The number of listings can fluctuate with the seasons (winter is slower).  If prices are going down for similar properties, or if the prices for properties we’re following are going down, then an increase in the number of listings could be good, as it means people are coming to their senses and trying to sell for what they can get.
• Time on the market.  We’ve gotten a few new listings, so we can see how long they stay on the market.  Knowing this would help us should we want to make an offer.  If the house has been on for a good long time, we can offer more aggressively (lower).
• Price per square foot.  This is a rough measure but a useful one.  If we really can buy more house for our money, we should see a reduction in the price per square foot.

The nice thing about this method is that it’s free.  Once we get the hang of this and get closer to making a decision we may sign up for www.RealtyTrac.com to get a handle on foreclosed and bank-owned properties.  We’ll probably pull the trigger on this when we are in a better position to make offers.

Tracking prices takes a little time but I’m sure this will help us to make a wise decision when we decide to look in earnest.

Add this to my list of last minute gift ideas: a couple of Restaurant.com discount deals and coupons to give you up to 80% off the gift certificates you purchase.

How about some good news for a change? I know my wallet needs a break from the never-ending drama in the financial markets, but just in time for the holidays, here are some pretty decent offers that make for some great gifts.

Watch this space for the latest Restaurant.com deals and coupons you can use!

Restaurant.com Discount Deals and Coupons

Newest Deal: 70% Off + $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com only at Restaurant.com

Description: Now you can save 70% Off + $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com when you try the new coupon code “THANKS”. It can be used on both of Restaurant.com’s most popular products, Dinner of the Month Club and the $25 Gift Certificates. This offer is now valid through November 30th!

Where To Order:

• 70% off Dinner of the Month Club and get $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com! Use the code THANKS. Valid 11/25 thru 11/30/08.
• 70% off $25 Gift Certificates and $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com! Use code THANKS and pay $3 only, for each $25 gift certificate. Valid 11/25/08 thru 11/30/08.

Gift Certificates

Restaurant.com has a couple of things they sell — they have $25 gift certificates that are normally sold for $10 each. That’s the usual price. But you can use promotional coupons as we’ve listed above, to receive even better prices for your gift certificates.

Now with their current promotion going on, you can get those $10 certificates (with the $25 dinner value) for 80% off. They’re now going for $2 if you use the PROMO CODE: SURPRISE and visit this link. This offer will be valid through November 24.

A very important caveat that you must be aware of and which I just double-checked: I’ve looked into the eligible restaurants where certificates can be applied, and the ones I’ve seen require a minimum spending amount at the restaurant. Please check your region for requirements on how the certificates can be used.

Dinner of the Month Club

Similarly, when Restaurant.com does a Dinner of the Month Club promotion, they give you a discount on already great prices on their Dinner of the Month Club program. Here’s an example of how their promotional discounts work.

Let’s say they give you an 80% off coupon deal on their program, which offers you 3, 6, or 12 month’s worth of gift certificates plus some bonus free gift certificates if you subscribe to this. Here is how the programs will be priced (again, this is just an illustration of the value savings you can get by using the coupons):

For the particular case of 80% off discounts on the gift certificates, if you order 3 months’ worth of gift certificates through “Dinner of the Month Club”, you get certificates valued at $75 that can be applied to any of your favorite restaurants on the Restaurant.com list. The price for those 3 month certificates will only be $6 PLUS you’ll get another $10 gift certificate for FREE. That is, your $6 will buy you $85 worth of gift certificates. By the same token, for $12, you’ll get gift certificates totaling up to $175; and for $24, you’ll receive gift certificates worth $350. Wooh, not bad! Note that the certificates are made available once per month from the time you make the purchase.

By using this link, you’ll get the 80% discount offer AND bonus freebies when you sign up. You’ll need to use the PROMO CODE: SURPRISE, which lasts through November 24.

For details on how to purchase, gift and redeem your certificates, just check the Help/FAQ section. What’s nice is that if you do use these as gifts, your recipient will only see their options for redeeming (and restaurants to choose from) but won’t see how much you’ve spent. These certificates will be good for a year from the date of purchase, but there can be special terms depending on which state you reside in, so just check their terms and conditions for additional details.

One last note: Restaurant.com does these deals quite often. When an offer like this expires, it doesn’t take long before they come up with a new promotion. But discounts range between 60% to 80% off and are given out periodically, but you just don’t know when they’ll be available. For the latest, current deals, please refer to our announcement at the beginning of this post for details.

This is a post from The Digerati Life.

Bookmark It