TagCloud:
Finance Ebooks:
| | Cash In On Real Estate. |  | | How I Improved My Finances $602,620.98 In One Evening With This Amazing New Real Estate System!
|  |  |  |
| | New! Dynacom Accounting Software - Soho. |  | | Promote Accounting Software ** 75% Profit! Make $22.46 Per Sale! Value $149 For Only $29,95. Help Entrepreneurs And Small Businesses Manage Their Finances The Easy Way! Offer A Full-featured Accounting Software. Need Help? Email Affiliates@dynacom.com.
|  |  |  |
| | Easy MoneyPlanner - Control Your Finances. |  | | A Simple System To Plan And Project Your Monthly Expenses To Keep Yourself Out Of The Red. Little Computing Knowledge Required - Designed To Be Easily Compared With Your Bank Statement On A Regular Basis. Great For The Self-employed As Well.
|  |  |  |
| | The Smart Startup Guide. |  | | Startup Secrets Of The Inc 500 Fastest Growing Companies. Learn How To Finance Your Startup The Way Serial Entrepreneurs Do.
|  |  |  |
| | Banking Secrets - Revealed. |  | | Gain Total Control Of Your Finances And Stop Wasting Money. Eliminate Unnecessary Bank Fees And Get Better Rates On Loans And Savings By Following These Simple Steps.
|  |  |  |
| | OptionSmart Picks. |  | | OptionSmart Picks: Trade Us Stock Options With The Average Return 10% Per Month! With OptionSmart As Your Guide You Dont Need To Be A Finance Expert Or Mathematician To Trade Options.
|  |  |  |
| | Financial Planning/Money Management E-Book. |  | | This Financial Planning Manual Is More Practical In Nature Than Theoretical. Learn Powerful Money Management Techniques To Help You Take Control Of Your Personal Finances, Manage Your Money, Eliminate Your Credit Card Debt And Stay Out Of Debt!
|  |  |  |
| | Personal Finance Software By Parcus Group. |  | | 100% Positive Customer Feedback, Take Or Improve Control Of Your Money, Learn How To Manage Finances & Invest, Increase Your Financial Intelligence, Take Care About Financial Future Of Your Family.
|  |  |  |
Blogs & Sites:
 Tecnorati
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
| [12/01/2008, 06:02] | Carnival of Personal Finance, Cyber Monday 2008 Edition |  |
Welcome to the Carnival of Personal Finance! It’s officially Cyber Monday 2008, the online doppelgaenger to Black Friday. This term was coined by the American Retail Federation three years ago after a majority of online retailers saw their sales go up the Monday after Thanksgiving. Snopes found that the busiest online shopping day is not Cyber Monday but a couple of weeks after. Regardless of whether online shoppers are only lukewarm about today, one thing’s for sure: there’s way less danger of getting injured by an online shopping cart. So enjoy the Carnival, and head over to Amazon or eBay with full assurance that the Internet will completely protect you from e-bruising by other online shoppers! Posts on Budgeting Posts on Career - Economic Crunch runs through a checklist for taking advantage of benefits on a new job. (These things can be a nice supplement to your salary.)
- Monagomoney offers parallel advice with five things to do if you get laid off. (Hopefully you’re not needing both this advice and the previous advice in the same day.)
- Dog Ate My Finances (ha!) will take Common Sense for $200, Alex. (Note: Careful punctuation is crucial in this blog’s tagline. Imagine, if you will, a misplaced colon: “Mid twenties. Big salary. Paying for some mistakes: a wedding, and life.” The name would then have to be changed to Alimony Ate My Finances.)
- Beating Broke asks: “What is freedom worth?“
Posts on Credit and Debt Posts on The Economy Posts on Finance Posts on Frugality Posts on Investing Posts on Money Management Posts on Real Estate Posts on Saving and Taxes Other Posts 
 |  |  |  |
| [11/27/2008, 20:58] | Back to Basics: Food, clothing, shelter |  | We may think that we need a lot of things. We may think we need cable TV, our morning coffee and bagel, a couple of pints at the pub each Friday, or a really big house with a mortgage that the lender had to “make work for our income.” These aren’t really needs when we get down to it, of course. They’re wants. The stuff we really need — after breathing — are (a) food (and clean water) in our stomachs, (b) clothes on our backs, and (c) cover over our heads. To this you might add basic medical care, education, and a few other very important things. Most people (especially if you’re reading this now, and especially me) can stand to cut out a lot of non-essential items if it’s needed. This is extreme downsizing and simplification. It isn’t fun, but it can be done. Moreover, what’s spent on the essentials can be trimmed way down to boot as well, by doing the little money-saving things again. Even the essentials can be simplified and scaled back! Here are a few ways to get by on spending less for food: - Consider generic brands over name brands. Generic or store brands are usually (but not always) cheaper than the name brand, and for some products they’re comparable or even better than the name brands. I prefer store brand diet soda in some cases because I like the taste of one sweetener over another.
- Use coupons for items you buy anyway. You can get them a number of places, like your weekend newspaper, from magazines, online at the websites for the products, or online at places like CoolSavings or MyPoints.
- Substitute less expensive foods. How about oatmeal instead of cereal? How about eggs instead of meat? How about rice and beans?
- Buy food that requires more preparation or reconstitution. As in dried beans over canned beans, dehydrated milk over milk in a carton, raw oatmeal over instant oatmeal, or big bags of rice over instant rice. The other advantage of reconstituting food is that it may keep longer than the “fresh” food.
- Buy food with less packaging. Packaging means extra cost, and the food tastes the same if it can be resealed and consumed in time. Binder clips work fine to keep “family-size” snack bags shut. Reusable storage containers are great for all kinds of food storage.
- Buy in bulk if the price is right and if you know you’ll use what you buy. We buy rice 50 pounds at a time, and use it. I buy the big Costco-size box of oatmeal, and eat it. It usually saves money to buy in quantity.
- Spend more at the grocery store and less at the restaurant. The cost savings is clear here. Eat in with friends as opposed to eating out with friends.
- Learn a few easy, cheap recipes. I know how to cook rice well enough so that I can prepare a cheap, filling lunch (and dinner sometimes) merely by putting a few ounces of beans over the top with some Worcestershire sauce. Heck, adding rice to a can of soup works, too.
- Be diligent about consuming leftovers. Odds are you’ll only be eating the same stuff a few days in a row at most. (Except at Thanksgiving: It’s turkey leftovers for at least a week!)
Cut your clothing bills, too: - Make your clothes last. Making things last can be a money-saver. My wife is an excellent sewer and has given some of my clothes an extra life. Simple Debt Free Living has a decent introduction and link collection for clothing repair. But even before that, be kind to your clothes in the washer and don’t overdry them.
- Check out yard sales. We’ve found great deals on baby clothes at yard sales, as in maybe a dime apiece for a bagful. My wife and I have found clothes for us, too.
- Check out thrift shops. Sometimes the donated clothing has hardly been worn. The bigger ones usually have a good selection of sizes. Sometimes they run sales to make room for things.
- Check out consignment shops. These are perceived as a little higher-brow than thrift stores but the premise is the same: buy used and save.
- Check out the clearance racks in department stores. Some department stores perpetually mark things up just to mark them down, but there are still good deals to be had at places like Macy’s or Kohl’s. Since my wife has a Macy’s store charge card she gets special coupons that get her some really good deals. Wal-Mart’s hard to beat, too.
- Check out eBay. There’s always eBay! They’ve been getting much more buyer-friendly these days. Buyers cannot receive negative feedback anymore, and eBay is also waging war against inflated shipping charges (which is in their interest, but that’s another story).
Cutting costs on shelter can be a touchy subject but please remember, it boils down to a roof over your head: - If you’re renting, think very carefully before buying a house. Owning a house is a worthwhile goal but it can be very expensive. During the real estate bubble times of the past few years it was more expensive to own a house than it was to rent. Or, if it was affordable to own a house, in some areas, it would become too expensive later (adjustable rate mortgages). The start-up costs can be a bit of a shock. Plus, you’re a lot less mobile in a home than in a rented apartment.
- Reduce operating costs of your living space. Keep the temperature warmer in the summer and cooler in the winter. Use compact fluorescent lightbulbs where you can. Seal cracks where heat (or cool air) can escape. Don’t use the clothes dryer for one pair of socks. And so forth.
- Reduce financing costs of your living space. Pay the mortgage (or rent) on time. Consider paying the mortgage down a little faster. Consider refinancing an adjustable-rate mortgage to a fixed-rate mortgage to remove interest rate risk and take advantage of a depreciating currency. Work to get rid of private mortgage insurance as soon as possible.
- Test the waters for signs of trouble. Is the checkbook balance going down month by month? Why? Is it due to increasing costs associated with your living space? Is is possible to move into a cheaper living space if the costs of your current living space are getting out of control? (A good friend realized this. His family had built a larger house and had been renting their original, smaller house. The costs of the larger house were too much, so they are working to sell off that one and move back in to their original house. Hey, it happens, but they recognized what the problem was and are fixing it.)
- Can someone share your living space? Can you take on a boarder or a roommate? An unmarried woman at work has a house and has taken on a roommate to subsidize her housing cost. Alan Corey did this to great benefit; he took the smallest room in the house so that he could rent out the larger ones for more money.
- No affordable options in your area? Since moving is costly, it’s usually easier to cut other expenses before contemplating a move, especially one out of town to a less expensive area. But if nothing else seems to work, this is an option. It may mean leaving friends and family, and finding another job, but the housing cost issue can go away if the price difference is large enough.
- What if the worst happens and you lose your living space? There are some options. They’re not great options, obviously, but better than nothing. Living after foreclosure or eviction might mean moving in with someone who will take you (and your family if they’re involved). It can mean finding a church or other group that will take you as a “shut-in.” It could mean taking whatever job you can and renting by the week (Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Nickel and Dimed found this to be a tough life ). Even more simply, it could mean pitching a tent or sleeping in your car. This kind of living isn’t something I’d wish on anyone, but unfortunately more people will be thrust into this kind of situation. And in any case, it doesn’t have to be forever.

 |  |  |  |
| [11/25/2008, 16:27] | Prospective Home Buyers, This is an Opportunity of a Lifetime - Don?t Screw it Up |  | Even Though Real Estate is Gloomy, Opportunities Will Present Themselves  The negative news in the real estate market continues. Every week it seems like a new report is out highlighting record drops in home sales, lower home prices, and more difficulties in obtaining a loan. For those who already own a home, or are trying to sell their home, this is obviously a difficult time. I don’t want to dismiss the hardship that this crisis has created, but I am glass is half full kind of guy, so I wanted to highlight some of the positive aspects of what is going on. Looking Ahead a Few Years When will the real estate market settle down? That is the million dollar question right now, and there are a lot of different thoughts. And to make things more difficult, some areas of the country will begin to rebound faster than others, so without a crystal ball, the best we can do is guess. That being said, I think it’s fair to say that it will be a while before we see any significant improvement. Whether it’s a year or two, or five years from now, it doesn’t really matter. Trying to pick the absolute bottom is like trying to pick the day the stock market bottoms out. If you’re a little early or little late to the party, you’ll still be fine. So, if you’re thinking about buying a house in the coming few years, you have a tremendous opportunity in front of you. In many cases, you could buy a home right now at a 25% or more discount from just a year or two ago. As prices continue to fall in coming months and years, you should find even steeper discounts. The good news is that there is no rush in buying. Even if home prices do begin to stabilize earlier than expected, they won’t immediately spike back up, especially with the excess inventory out there. This means that you’ll have a pretty long window of time where you should be able to buy your home without being concerned about skyrocketing prices or strong demand. Start Getting Your Credit in Order Today Even if you don’t plan on buying a home for another few years, it is never too early to begin thinking about your credit score and the effect it will have on your ability to secure lending. Banks have learned their lessons (at least I hope so), and that means we’re returning to times where credit is harder to get, and those with poor credit will find it extremely difficult to obtain financing, or may pay a significantly higher interest rate. This makes having a clean credit history more important than ever. When it comes to improving your credit score, it’s important to have time. This is why it’s a good idea to start planning as early as possible. For one, if you have negative marks on your credit report, the only thing that will remove them is time. In most cases, seven years, or ten if a bankruptcy. So, check your credit report and look for negative marks. How long ago were they? If you have a late payment showing up five years ago and think you’ll be buying a house in about three years, it looks like that would be removed, and improve your score once it’s time to apply for a loan. Even if you do have more recent dings on your score, the good news is that their importance diminishes over time, so that is still in your favor. Just make sure you don’t make any more late payments! In addition, if you have a few years yet and you currently have very little credit, you have time to open or close lines of credit as needed in order to maximize your score. Remember, length of credit history is also very important, as well as what types of credit you have, and the credit utilization. This gives you time to maximize those aspects of your report as well. Use this time wisely, and don’t wait until just before applying for a loan to begin thinking about your credit score. And don’t forget to check out these tips on how to improve your credit score. Think About the Down Payment In the past, it was common to put 20% down on a home. In the 90s, with rapidly increasing home prices and easy access to credit, this became less common, and many people were able to get attractive financing with little or even no money down. Of course, when your home is expected to increase in value by 20% each year, it made sense. As we’ve seen lately, having equity in your home from day one has many advantages, especially when it becomes clear that home values don’t always increase each year. Not only that, but putting 20% down can get you out of paying private mortgage insurance, or PMI. This keeps your monthly payments low, and helps you put more money in your pocket. That being said, more banks are now requiring money down. There are still plenty of offers out there for zero or low down payment loans, but you’ll need even higher credit scores, and might pay a premium for those loans. Bringing money to the table will help you if you have less than perfect credit, and will help ensure you’re getting the best rate. This doesn’t mean you have to spend years and years trying to scrape together $50,000 or more, but you have enough time to begin thinking about a down payment and to start saving up now. If you’re looking at a home purchase in the next few years, just saving a couple hundred a month can make a good dent in your down payment over time. Again, time is on your side here, and the sooner you can begin taking advantage, the better off you’ll be. Don’t Screw This Up If you don’t own a home and want to buy, or are thinking about upgrading in the coming years, this is a tremendous opportunity. You have just enough time to get your financial house in order so that you will be able to take advantage of the decline in home prices. Use this time wisely, and don’t screw it up. If you wait until the last minute, you’ll miss out on plenty of areas where you could maximize your purchase. And above all, don’t make the same mistakes people have made in the past. Once the economy begins to recover, the stock market takes off, and home prices begin to rise again, it’s easy to forget about what got us into this mess. Remember, you buy a home for a place to live first and foremost. Find a home that is suitable for your needs, and understand exactly how much home you can truly afford. Don’t borrow too much, and don’t put yourself at further risk by taking on an exotic mortgage. And most of all, don’t go into your home purchase expecting the value to double in five years. If you plan ahead, stick to the basics, and don’t get greedy, you’ll find yourself in a fantastic position. You’ll have a nice roof over your head, you’ll be able to weather future economic troubles, and since you were able to buy at a significant discount, you might even stand to make some money when you sell in the future. Opportunities to learn from past mistakes and to take advantage of relatively low prices don’t come along that often, so make the most of it. Image credit: TheTruthAbout Prospective Home Buyers, This is an Opportunity of a Lifetime - Don’t Screw it Up 
 |  |  |  |
| [11/25/2008, 00:42] | Worst Economic Crisis Since The Great Depression: Who?s To Blame? |  | Who’s to blame for the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression? Warning… long rant ahead. Have you heard the latest bad joke around? Okay not this bailout crisis joke I wrote about a week or so ago but the one on how we’re socializing our financial markets by making the taxpayers bail out all our financial institutions. As someone put it, “this is a form of wealth distribution alright, the government robbing from the poor to give to the rich….”. So when will this nightmare of a crisis end? Sure we’re shoring up our failing banks and institutions right now, and even possibly certain vital industries that are the heart and pulse of our nation. But, I also see the flip-side, which is the fact that we (and our kids, and maybe even our grandkids) will be paying off for this till kingdom come, with the whole thing financed by our debt to foreign interests (e.g. Chinese). This soap opera can’t be without its sorry cast of characters. Capitalism Gone Awry I wonder: how naive have I been? I am big on capitalism and believe wholeheartedly in rewarding anyone for the work they’ve done and value they’ve produced. I’ve always been of the mind that, if a CEO does well by his company and makes me happy as a stockholder, I have no qualms in approving a commensurate pay package for the geezer. I’ve always been a proponent of self-regulation and a laissez faire economy, but this very thing has led to the disasters we’re seeing today. Now with the government sweeping in to save “the big guys” from themselves and their gross mistakes, I see that apparently, self-accountability is optional in this free market. Very interesting what this blog has to say: Now consider: finance is a necessary function, but is represents a tax, a drain on the productive economy, just as defense and lawyers do. It is ironic that free market fundamentalists have so vociferously argued for unfettered markets, without understanding (or perhaps understanding all too well) that the house always wins. The whole crisis has caused a very large swing from one extreme to another, the moving pendulum leaving behind much collateral damage: credit’s gone from very loose to extremely tight overnight. Some people who had access to a lot of credit will correctly have a lot less, and that on dearer terms. But there are also perfectly worthwhile businesses and individuals who are also caught in the meat grinder of indiscriminate reduction of loan balances. Times are bad, and any efforts to extract more revenues from customers, even if it is blood from a turnip, or worse, even if it puts a viable business under, is warranted. Silly me to have been so gullible, as I now stand confused about what should be done and how the economy should be run. It doesn’t help that I keep reading stuff like this to feed my migraines and sour stomach bouts. How This Economic Crisis Is Breaking Financial Rules What stance do I take now, as a die-hard pro-business supporter? I had placed my faith in the “powers that be” and didn’t think I’d ever see these levels of corruption, unchecked greed and blatant mismanagement in a first world country on this grand a scale (yes, I say this as someone who’s no stranger to the machinations of the third world, where corrupt ineptitude is rampant). This stuff happens, sure enough, but it happens in another world, and under the covers. But there’s no hiding the ugly anymore. All I can see now is just how the ruling class has done a number on the working masses. And for the millions of people who followed the financial rule book throughout their lives to meet a horrible end to their futures because of the incompetent, morally degenerate few — well, I can say I’m beyond disappointed, and have crossed the line to feeling outrage and disgust. Yes, this crisis is breaking all sorts of rules, including those I’d consider as long-standing successful personal financial tenets. Responsible approaches to personal finance don’t have a chance against a crisis of tsunamic proportions: So let’s see — doing the right thing by scrimping, saving, investing, diversifying, doing proper asset allocation, avoiding market timing, indexing, and hedging against inflation through equities, even doing your job well will no longer guarantee you a splendid, worry-free financial future. Not when a “once in a century financial event” can just come by and rob you off the stuff you worked so hard for; not when someone “up there” can change the rules for you, just like that. I didn’t necessarily see it coming, but some of my readers here have: I see just how observant readers have been, as they’ve shared their insights on the causes and consequences of the subprime mortgage financial crisis, the pros and cons of financial bailouts, and the relevance of market timing during a stock market bear and the current investment climate. The Economic Crisis Calls For Faith: Do You Have Any To Spare? Perhaps I’ve placed far too much faith in the integrity of our political and business leaders and trends in modern history to believe that our financial system was strong enough (and people were smart and honest enough) to absorb any shakeups, shocks and imbalances that happen. I still have hope, but recent events continually call to question my position in this matter. Not long ago, I had asked: who’s to blame for the subprime mortgage mess? I said then that everyone here had a hand in this (from the mortgage lenders to the developers to the Fed to ignorant homeowners), but in reality, I’m now seeing where the bulk of that blame should go. It should be clear by now who should bear the brunt of your harsh judgment: follow the money. Sure we (as the little people) can’t really do much about this (except whine, rant and call the villains out), but with more discussion, we can spread awareness of these ridiculous affairs. What I got out of this is that there’s little out there we can count on and few people we can trust when it comes to our finances. A sobering thought. Do you think there are really any lessons and takeaways here for the future? Do we even have much of a future the way it’s been mortgaged? I welcome your thoughts on this matter. Fire away! This is a post from The Digerati Life. 
|  |  |  |
| [11/24/2008, 14:38] | FNBO Direct Savings Account Review - High-Yield Savings at 3.25% |  | FNBO Direct Provides Great Rates and Great Service  With interest rates continuing to be slashed across the board, finding attractive yields on savings accounts is becoming even more difficult. At the very least, you’d like to have your savings try to keep up with inflation, but even that can be a tall order these days. Of course, interest rates aren’t everything, and you also want a bank that is secure, provides great service, and has a useful online interface. Luckily, FNBO Direct is a great opportunity to receive a competitive interest rate, remain FDIC insured, and have access to a pretty nice online interface. FNBO Account Features - No account minimum
- 3.25% APY as of this writing
- FDIC insured
Just like opening an account with most online, or even traditional banks, you will need to provide some information in order to sign up, verify your identity, and link to other existing accounts. To open an account with FNBO Direct, you’ll need: - Your Social Security or Tax ID Number.
- Your Driver?s License or ID card issued by a state DMV.
- Employer information.
- Information about any loans or mortgages that you may have to help us confirm your identity.
- For instant funding, you will need your current bank account and routing numbers.
- If a joint account, the other applicant’s information.
Sign Up Today There are obviously a lot of choices when it comes to savings accounts, but with rates continuing to decline, making sure your money is working its hardest is increasingly important. While I’m not a big fan of rate chasing, I think FNBO Direct is a good place to stick it out. In the past, they have been one of the last banks to drop rates when it was time for a rate cut, and the rates are consistently at the higher end of the spectrum. So, sign up today for your own FNBO Direct account. FNBO Direct Savings Account Review - High-Yield Savings at 3.25% 
 |  |  |  |
| [11/23/2008, 12:39] | Obama and his Job Creation (2.5M) Plan. |  |  President Elect Obama came out on his weekly Democratic radio address and gave his plan to save the U.S. Economy. It is an infrastructure plan which includes rebuilding roads and bridges and modernizing schools. He stated that "These aren't just steps to pull ourselves out of this immediate crisis. These are the long-term investments in our economic future that have been ignored for far too long," . That is good as short term fixes (see the rebate checks given out a few mnths ago)only delay the inevitable. We need to get to the problem.
First stabilize Financial institutions. I think we are close on this count.... Second keep people in their homes. The big problem here is even if the mortgage companies stop on the foreclosures many people do not have jobs anymore and cannot pay anything. So that leads me to number three, Third get people working. By delaying foreclosures and creating a jobs program (needs to be up and running quickly) hopefully we can get this economy moving in a positive direction quickly.
Now for reality. Unemployment is going higher, probably increasing 4.5% over the next 4-6 months. I am not an economist but a realist. I look at store front and empty stores in malls. I see more people sleeping on the streets when I go to work in the morning and I hear of more of my friends and neighbors losing their jobs and not finding new ones.
I am glad to hear Obama stepping up and presenting a plan(and a Treasury Secretary). It is very important for the American people to see that their leader is doing something. Stocks need to stabilize as when they do people feel more comfortable spending money. We will get out of this and I suspect sooner rather then later. American like to spend money and they have short memories. As soon as the Economy looks like it is turning the corner alot of people will pile in.
Good Luck and Good Currency Trading. |  |  |  |
| [10/20/2008, 19:41] | Going out like a Rock Star |  | Andrew Lahde, manager of a hedge fund that profited enormously by speculating on the failure of firms that made major bets on sub-prime mortgages, has called it quits. His "so long, and thanks for the fish" comes in the form of this letter. Enjoy. |  |  |  |
| [08/21/2008, 14:30] | Inflation |  | Well for anyone (except apparently economists) it really shouldn?t come as a surprise that inflation in Canada is on the rise. The inflation rate in Canada is now sitting at approximately 3.4% versus 3.1% during the same period last year. Although 3.4% is quite manageable for most households it is the largest increase we?ve seen in the last five years. Here are the main culprits behind the rise:
-gasoline up 28.6% -natural gas up 25% -food (avg) up 4.3% -bakery products up 13.2% -mortgage costs up 8.3%
Note: Although our inflation is rising we are still a full 2 points lower than our U.S neighbours. |  |  |  |
| [07/29/2008, 15:34] | U.S Housing - Just Walk Away... |  | | Well if you?re in the market for a house in Las Vegas or Miami they all just went on sale for 28% off. I?m not suggesting that they?re good value, just cheaper than they were. Compared with the previous year house prices in both Las Vegas and Miami dropped a whopping 28% last month. These markets sagged a full 12% lower than the national average, which saw declines of approximately 16%. With declines like these it is no wonder that the delinquency rate is rising. In many markets it?s now cheaper and faster to simply default on your mortgage and walk away from the house than it would be to pay off an inflated mortgage. In the amount of time it would take to pay off the value that you?ve lost on your home you could have saved enough money for another house and rebuilt your credit. For example, if you purchased a house last year in Las Vegas or Miami for $350,000 you would now be down a whopping $98,000 in equity. At that point the only financially responsible thing to do would be to default on your mortgage. Why not just walk away? |  |  |  |
| [07/14/2008, 04:09] | FEDS BAIL OUT FANNIE AND FREDDIE; EMERGENCY MEASURES TAKEN |  | In a clear sign the federal government is far more concerned about the financial health of mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than its public comments indicated as late as Friday, the U.S. government Sunday night announced what some are calling a “massive aid” package to the two shareholder owned and run companies officially cementing a government relationship that till now was only implied but never admitted to. According to a Reuters dispatch, the plan, which will require swift approval from Congress, is designed to “head off a potential meltdown in financial markets.” Here’s what the government is offering Fannie and Freddie: - Access to its emergency cash–the so-called discount window
- A huge “temporary” increase in the line of credit available
- The U.S. Treasury will, for the first time ever, purchase equity in both companies should it be needed
- Investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission to stop the spread of “false information.”
Both Fannie and Freddie are vital to the housing market–they buy mortgages from banks and other lenders and either keep them or repackage them into securities that are sold to investors. “Welcome to the socialist state” Strong words from some critics are already greeting the government plan. Josh Rosner, the managing director at Graham Fisher in New York told Reuters, “It’s outrageous. It’s offensive. Welcome to the socialist state. In capitalism, winners are supposed to reap rewards and losers are supposed to take losses for bad risk management. These are private companies.” But others are deeply concerned that should Fannie and Freddie fail–though they both say they are well capitalized–the shockwaves would cause a financial meltdown world-wide. The most troubling part of the government plan,perhaps, is the possibility the Treasury might buy equity in Fannie and Freddie. Some critics charge this could end up costing taxpayers enormous sums of money. It will be interesting to see whether Wall Street gives the plan a thumbs up or thumbs down during Monday’s trading. Here are 2 more articles worth reading: Advertisement: Real Estate Investing Forums Discuss real estate, network, or learn about investing on our forums! This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FEDS BAIL OUT FANNIE AND FREDDIE; EMERGENCY MEASURES TAKEN 
|  |  |  |
| [07/13/2008, 17:03] | Are Mortgage Brokers An Endangered Species? |  | By all accounts it seems the banking lobby will get everything they’ve been ask for from Congress over the past decade and in do so may legislate mortgage brokers out of existence. A little history lesson is in order to understand all the political and media spin designed to sway their and public opinion away from mortgage brokers the banking industry orchestrated for the last 10 plus years. During the 70’s and early 80’s, banks dominated originations carving out a whopping 80% of the retail loan applications. Brokers quickly picked up the slack and by the early 90’s the numbers reversed. The market, especially real estate investors, liked the idea of a personal mortgage broker who understood their goals scouring the landscape for the best products and rates. Banks have never been know for the best customer service or pricing and the public punished them by fleeing to the broker community. During this time brokers enjoyed about 75% of all originations leaving the crumbs for the banks. They didn’t take that lying down. The quickly got their lobbyists working on legislation that passed in 1999 to poison the market against broker by demanding brokers show their “yield spread premium” income while the banks were allowed to hide their own. The thought was the public upon seeing this often times enormous “profit” that was heretofore hidden would put brokers in a bad light with consumers and they would come running back to the banks. It didn’t happen. As it turns out consumer either didn’t know or didn’t care. Some critics ( myself included) would say the brokers decided one “dirty trick” deserved another and devised ways of obfuscating the YSP. After all banks were getting away with setting up an un-level playing field in the first place so they could claim they were just “evening the score”. Undaunted in their pursuit of the killing off their competition, many believe the banks decided upon a “scorched earth” plan to rid themselves of retail mortgage competition once and for all. The Plan was one they pulled from the S&L playbook a decade earlier. Give the mortgage brokers just enough rope to hang themselves just like the Savings and Loans did. Remember the Savings and Loan crisis of the late 80’s? Banks wanted the S&L’s out of the way back then too. When a few greedy large S&L’s decided they wanted “deregulation” so they could make commercial loans it was the banking lobby who helped them get it. At the time it seemed like “strange bedfellows”, but it only took a few years to see the banking industry genius behind their “assistance. They knew the S&L’s were unprepared to thwart their own greed and would create a “banking and real estate crash” lawmakers and the public would rightfully lay at their doorstep. All the banks had to do this time around was find an equally stupid idea, attach a lot of money to it, and let the brokers commit a little “banker-assisted” suicide. Enter the subprime loan. Bankers priced them, marketed them, and feed them to a stupid, greedy bunch who cobbled them down with out the knowledge they’d just been had. It worked. Lawmakers and the public are clearly laying the current real estate and banking debacle at the doorstep of mortgage brokers. Legislation will pass making mortgage brokers all but extinct. It worked so well that the banks may have succeeded in taking down not only the brokers but the mechanism that put them in business in the first place…the GSEs…Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. On Friday there were cries to bailout the GSEs since they too got caught in the bankers web of greed. The infection of subprime losses it seems put both GSEs on tilt. With them out of the way, the broker have no hope of staging a comeback since it’s Fannie and Freddie’s pathway to the money markets that give brokers something to sell. The banker planted subprime virus not only killed brokers and the GSEs, but will likely kill the real estate industry and economy for the next few years too. But when the dust settles a few years from now, every one will go to a bank to get a mortgage because that is all that is left. Mission Accomplished! If investors thought getting a loan was hard before, just wait. You ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Advertisement: Payday Loans Online from the leader in online cash advances since 2003. This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Are Mortgage Brokers An Endangered Species? 
|  |  |  |
| [07/12/2008, 21:50] | Online Chat Room Helps Save Foreclosure Homeowner |  | Okay I admit it? I used to be an active ?chatter? in a local chat room on Yahoo. It was a room where many people from the Dallas area met up to?Chat. Many of us had met outside of the cyber room at local restaurants, clubs and the like. Yahoo had recently shut down a lot of the member created chat rooms in the wake of all the negativity and sponsor lawsuits. Lets face it?The public opinion of chat rooms was not good. I was a virtual unknown person to most chatters because I stayed away from the ?in person? socials but, that all changed one morning. Here is what happened: A room regular was talking on ?voice? and venting about his house early one morning and I was listening a few steps away making my breakfast. This is what ?Monte? said, ?I got this letter from some attorney who says he is going to sell my house! How does he think he can do that? He doesn?t own MY house so, how can he sell MY house?? My head spun around so fast that I almost gave myself whiplash. I ran to the computer and grabbed the microphone to speak in the room and here is what was said? Jim: Monte, what is the name of the law firm that sent you that letter? Monte: Uhmmm, it says ummm.. Barnett, Burke & Associates. Jim: Would that be BARRETT Burke? Monte: Yeah, that?s it. Jim: Monte, email me your number. I need to talk to you NOW. (That law firm processes nearly 40% of all foreclosures in the state of Texas) Within a few minutes I was on the phone with him and I told him that I was a local foreclosure expert and taught classes at Foreclosure Listing Service in Addison. I told him I needed to meet with him and his wife right away because, the letter he got was his notice that his house was in foreclosure and he had less than three weeks left before it would go to the auction. He was shocked and claimed he had no idea (I didn?t know how he could be shocked after missing nine payments). Two hours later I was at his house and explained all about the foreclosure process to him and his wife and what options he may have to save his house. I remember how bad I felt while explaining the situation because his wife just sat there, staring at me with her eyes wide open, not able to say a word. She had no idea the mortgage was past due at all. She had not seen any letters from the lender or taken any call from them. Monte never told her early on and the situation only got worse as the missed payments added up. After going over all of the possible solutions, I decided that bankruptcy was likely the best option for them and they agreed. I made a call to Hariett Langston, a friend of mine who is a bankruptcy lawyer in Dallas. Monte and his wife were overwhelmed with the situation and asked if I would go with them when they met with the attorney and I told them I would. We met with Hariett that same week and everything appeared to be set to stop the foreclosure. All Monte needed to do was pay the bankruptcy filing fee. A week before the foreclosure sale I went to their house and was a bit surprised to learn that he had not paid the filing fee. I asked him when he was going to file and he just shook his head and said he didn?t know. I remember pausing for a few seconds and it dawned on me why he had not filed. I said, ?Monte? You don?t have the money to file, do you?? In a very humble manner, he looked down at the floor and shook his head. ($500 was the amount he needed to get the bankruptcy filed) As I drove home I thought to myself that it would be simple if I just wrote a check for the $500 but, I thought that he really needed to pay something so important himself. I got an idea about that time and sent an email to one of the chat room regulars who organized the chat room socials. I recall stating in that email that online chat rooms have such a negative public image and went on to tell her about Monte, his situation and I asked her if she could set up a fund raising get together. It would be our way of proving that normal, everyday people go to chat rooms and this was a chance to show at least one chat room could do something good. I told her that he only needed $500 and all it would take is $5 here, $10 there and a $20 from a few? $500 could be raised. She arranged to have a Dallas chat fundraiser social for that coming Saturday night. I called Monte and told him about the fundraiser. He asked me to not do it (his pride was the obstacle) but, I told him that we were going to do it anyway and it would be nice if he attended. He later told me he was so choked up that he couldn?t say anything but, he did finally say he would attend. I expected a handful of people to show up for the fundraiser but, I was wrong. Much to my surprise? At least 50 to 60 regulars from that chat room showed up and contributed. At the end of the night, ordinary people from a Yahoo chat room donated more than $700 to help save someone from losing their house. The next day I gave the proceeds to Monte & his wife and they quickly paid the attorney the fee to file their bankruptcy and their house?No?Their ?home? was saved. The story got another interesting twist a few days later. I got a call from a reporter who wrote for a well known local media outlet. They had heard about the fundraiser and thought it was a great community effort story that should be told and asked if I wanted them to write about it. It took only a few seconds for me to process my answer but, I remember thinking that such publicity would be great for business and my classes would see a boost in attendance. Then I thought about the possibility of other homeowners that would read the story and what would my answer be to them if they contacted me and asked me to do a fundraiser for them as well? I told the reporter that as wild as the story was, I never expected things to unfold as they did. I told them that I had to pass on their offer because, I had done it to help someone and wouldn?t feel right about profiting off of someone else?s stressful and humbling foreclosure experience. They understood and that was the end of it. I have to admit . . . Of all the positive experiences I have had in real estate, helping Monte might rank as number one. What stands out in my mind was the fact that so many people pitched in to help save a family from losing their home and they did it for someone most had never met or only knew of by screen name?That?s what made it so great. This happened in 2005 and two days ago I got a phone call from Monte. He just wanted to give me an update and I was happy to hear they still have their home. During the call I told him about the reporter. He was surprised I hadn?t told him and more surprised that I turned them down. At the end of the call, Monte told me that three years was long enough and he encouraged me to tell the story of how a bunch of chatters from a Yahoo chat room, came together and did something good. Thanks Monte. Advertisement: Real Estate Investing Forums Discuss real estate, network, or learn about investing on our forums! This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Online Chat Room Helps Save Foreclosure Homeowner 
|  |  |  |
| [07/12/2008, 01:30] | BREAKING: IndyMac Bank is Shut Down and Taken Over by Feds |  | INDYMAC IS OFFICALLY CLOSED!!! In the past minutes newswires around the country and world are now reporting that the Federal Government has shut down IndyMac Bank and has handed it to the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) as conservator. Couple the shut down with the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac troubles, and we’re in for some really rocky waters next week. I’m willing to bet a lot of money that the announcement was held back from being made prior to the close of the stock market because of fears of a massive crash. Well . . . I think we’ll be seeing that happen this coming Monday! Fasten your seat belts, people . . . we’re in for a ROCKY RIDE! IndyMac Bank’s assets were seized by federal regulators on Friday after the mortgage lender succumbed to the pressures of tighter credit, tumbling home prices and rising foreclosures. The bank is the largest regulated thrift to fail and the second largest financial institution to close in U.S. history, regulators said. Yahoo Finance In the biggest bank failure of the housing downturn to date, federal banking regulators today closed IndyMac Bank FSB, naming the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. as conservator. The FDIC said it will transfer insured deposits and “substantially all the assets” of IndyMac Bank, to a newly created successor, IndyMac Federal Bank, which will be operated by the FDIC. Insured depositors and borrowers will automatically become customers of IndyMac Federal, FSB and will continue to have uninterrupted customer service and access to their funds by ATM, debit cards and writing checks. Depositors of IndyMac Federal Bank FSB will have no access to online and phone banking services this weekend, but will regain access to them on Monday. Inman News IndyMac Bancorp Inc. became the second-biggest federally insured financial company to fail today after a run by depositors left the California mortgage lender short on cash. The Pasadena, California-based bank specialized in so-called Alt-A mortgages, which didn’t require borrowers to provide documentation on their incomes. Its home state has been among the hardest hit by foreclosures. Bloomberg What’s next? Anyone? Advertisement: Payday Loans Online from the leader in online cash advances since 2003. This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BREAKING: IndyMac Bank is Shut Down and Taken Over by Feds 
|  |  |  |
| [07/12/2008, 00:13] | Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac: What Will The Feds Do? |  | Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combined, own or back up some $5 trillion dollars of debt. That is about half of ALL the mortgages in the U.S. They have already lost some $11 BILLION since the current mortgage/credit crisis began, so it is easy to see why there is profound concern about their fiscal health–or lack there of. Concern turned to horror today after the New York Times reported that the U.S. government is thinking about a takeover of the mortgage giants–placing them in a conservatorship. Should that happen, the shares of both could be worth almost nothing and taxpayers, you and me, would have to pick up the tab, says the Times, for “any losses on mortgages they own or guarantee–which could be staggering…” This news brought about what the AFP news agency referred to in a headline as a “meltdown” of the share prices of both Fannie and Freddie. According to Reuters, “Fannie shares closed at $10.25, down some 22 percent but well above the session low of $6.68. Freddie closed at $7.75, down 3 percent, after touching a low of $3.89 earlier in the session.” And, here is the most amazing part of the story. Freddie and Fannie have lost almost 90 percent of their enture value just since August, says Reuters. Doubts about bailout As the day drew to a hectic close, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson sent out signals that it is not likely there will be any federal bailout–However, Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said he spoke with both Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and that they are looking at options that would include “opening access to the discount window,” Reuters reports. The discount window allows the Fed to act as an emergency lender for the banking system. Meantime, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac insisted they have enough capital to keep going and Sen. Dodd said both are “fundamentally sound and strong.” Although both were originally formed by the federal government, they now function as private corporations, though there has always been an assumption that the government would never let either go under for fear of what might happen to the entire financial system in this country and, indeed, around the world. How they got into trouble To understand how they got into trouble, you must first understand what it is they do. Both buy up literally hundreds of billions of dollars in mortgages–then repackage them as securities. In some cases, they hold on to these new securities, but they also sell them to investors. That is why when the subprime mortgage crisis hit,Fannie and Freddie were hit hard. And, says the New York Times, “analysts expect the companies to announce a new round of write-downs and possibly be forced to raise capital by issuing additional shares.” Stocks tumble then regain At first, the fears of a Fannie/Freddie implosion plunged the Dow Jones Industrial Average down more than 200 points…but, by the end of the trading day, it closed down “just” 128.48 points. Advertisement: Real Estate Investing Forums Discuss real estate, network, or learn about investing on our forums! This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac: What Will The Feds Do? 
|  |  |  |
| [07/08/2008, 19:14] | Want to Retire Rich? Stay Married |  | I think everyone out there knows at least a few people who have had to for one reason or another part ways with their spouse. Other than the emotional costs of divorce there is a huge financial burden as well. Let?s just do a little exercise, take all of your networth (including pension) and divide it in half. Before you divide your networth in half don?t forget to subtract the thousands of dollars usually required to legally file for divorce and all of the associated real estate fees that go along with selling the cottage, house etc...Next you?ll want to take all of your shared living expenses, mortgage, heat, hydro, gas, cable, internet, house taxes etc... and double them (because you?ll each need your own place now).
Get the point? Divorce is expensive...so if money is tight it just might be worth working a little bit less (not more) and spend that time with your spouse instead....(especially if you live in Quebec)
PROVINCIAL DIVORCE RATES Newfoundland and Labrador - 17.1% Prince Edward Island - 27.3% New Brunswick - 27.6% Nova Scotia - 28.9% Saskatchewan - 29.0% Manitoba - 30.2% Ontario - 37.0% British Columbia - 39.8% Alberta - 40.0% Quebec - 49.7%
Source: Statistics Canada, 2003 |  |  |  |
| [07/01/2008, 19:45] | We?re All Going to Die Someday: Making Informed Insurance Choices |  | This is a guest post from Amanda, a Colorado tech writer and an activist for children with congenital heart disease. This article is about Amanda’s personal experience with insurance. It’s not a prescription for other people, but insights into the value of insurance in her own life. It’s her hope that it will get you thinking. There was a time in my life when the thought of insurance made my eyes glaze over. I’ve never been one to want to read details in insurance contracts, license agreements, etc. I also don’t always enjoy thinking through potential unpleasant situations. So, when it comes to buying and using insurance, I’ve learned some lessons the hard way. I’ve made some mistakes with my car insurance, for instance. When I bought a second car to drive to grad school several years ago, I thought, “No, I don’t want to pay $3 extra a month for rental car coverage because we have two cars.” A few months later, I rear-ended a woman on the highway going 45mph. It took a while to get my car back, and my insurance went up a lot. But it also made it difficult for my husband Jim to get back and forth to work while I used the other car for work and school. I had thought I didn’t need rental car coverage, because I figured, “Oh, I won’t be the one to cause an accident.” Ha! There is a reason it’s called an “accident.” So, lesson learned — I needed rental car coverage. I learned was to understand what I was buying. Insurance details can be a pain: - How high of a deductible can I actually afford?
- What kind of impact will that have on my emergency savings if I have to pay it?
- How much will I save by trimming features?
Recently I got a notice that wet- and dry-rot are no longer covered in my homeowners policy — do they know something I don’t? I’m still trying to figure out what this means to me, but I did notice that the price didn’t go down. Also, it took me five months to update the beneficiary information with the insurance company; I finally got it done right before Christmas. So, I’m not an insurance expert by any means, but I am a consumer and I have to make choices. You’ve got my back — right? In the early 1980s, my dad had his left foot crushed in a construction accident, and he nearly had it amputated. He couldn’t work for two years, during which our family of six lived on workers’ compensation wages of less than $1000/month. My sister was still a toddler and my dad couldn’t walk, much less care for her or pick us up from school, so my mom couldn’t get a job that paid enough to cover daycare. When I was 19, working at McDonald’s I spent two months on workers’ comp after a pot of McHot McCoffee broke open and burned the skin right off my left foot. I was paid 75% of my wages, but did not have to pay taxes. Still, it was really hard to live on what amounted to less than minimum wage that summer. When I was 21, my dad was diagnosed with esophageal cancer. For nine months, he lived off of his paid disability insurance through work. For his last nine months, he lived off of Social Security. There was a substantial difference in coverage. I have never been confused by an AFLAC commercial — I know exactly what that duck is quacking about. I don’t buy their product, but I appreciate what they’re selling. When they offer disability insurance at work, I buy the maximum allowed. It’s a few bucks out of my pay check, but I ate enough government cheese in my childhood to know the value of this coverage. At least I’ve still got my health I could write a book on health insurance. (Maybe someday I will.) When my dad fought cancer in the mid-nineties, he had over one million dollars in medical bills. At the time, all but $4,500 were covered by his insurance. From 2003-2007, my own nuclear family paid out about $58,000 for insurance deductibles, copays and prescriptions; yet our insurance company has come closer to $3 million dollars (before their contractual discounts with hospitals and doctors). There are a lot of open-heart surgeries and a couple of c-sections, and an ambulance ride and a lap-coli in that tally, but as much as I might complain about my part: - It’s not $3 million, and
- At least much of it was tax-deductible.
Once when I was sitting in the waiting room with my son at the cardiologist, a woman asked the receptionist how much an echocardiogram costs. The receptionist didn’t know; the nurses didn’t know; the doctor certainly didn’t know. It was early in my cardiology adventures, but now I could tell her it’s roughly $900-$1200, with another $200 for the cardiologist visit and $300 facility fee; so at least $1500 to tell her where her son’s murmur was on the spectrum of “let’s watch this” to “he needs a transplant or he’ll die.” This woman, who ran a small business with her husband, had no insurance on her eight-year-old son. She had to talk to the finance department before she could decide whether she could afford to have this ultrasound to learn the secrets in her son’s heart. I don’t know what happened to her after that, but from what I know about congenital heart disease, she could easily be owing the hospital and doctors over a million dollars today. If their business was remotely successful they would not have qualified for Medicaid until a year after they went completely bankrupt. Today’s bankruptcy laws make it even harder for families to recover from these setbacks. Your money or your life Growing up, my father always emphasized the value of insurance. I knew our family’s insurance agent personally — he came to our house twice a year. When my dad was ten, his own father dropped dead of a heart-attack. My grandma lost the house, and they were forced to stay with relatives until she remarried. Like his father before him, my dad died young. He was only 48 when his battle with cancer ended — clearly cancer won. My parents never had a lot of money, but my dad always made room in the budget for life insurance. My mother, who had been a stay-at-home mom since she was 17, had no work experience or job skills, but when my dad died, she was able to pay off their modest home and create retirement accounts for herself. Eventually, she used the care-giving skills she acquired as a parent, and taking care of my dying father, to start a career caring for the elderly. If my dad hadn’t obtained solid life insurance, my mother would have struggled to keep her house, and wouldn’t have had the luxury to try out a few different jobs before she found the right fit for her. Those were my early life- and disability-insurance lessons. So, when we were 21 and 22, Jim and I bought our first life insurance policies. It’s no coincidence that my dad was going through chemo at the time. We started with $100,000 each. For a 21-year-old non-smoking woman, that was pretty cheap! Now I have a little over $1,000,000 and Jim has about half that (work doesn’t offer as much for the spouse as the employee). We pay about $80 a month for all of that life insurance. I’ve worked it out, and with my son’s heart condition and the cost of our mortgage, we may be slightly over-insured for me, but not for Jim. If he died and I took a leave of absence (or worse if I were in an accident with him and incapacitated) that money could handle our mortgage until I was able to get back to work and childcare after it, but that’s all. Also, if we both died, a trust would be created for our kids that would not be eaten up by our son’s medical expenses, so at least our kids could still go to college and have essentials during the rest of their childhoods. I think I’ll always carry enough life insurance to pay for my funeral and settle immediate, because insurance usually pays out faster than investment funds. I learned this when both of my grandparents died last year. The insurance check came six weeks before the investment money. They had actually pre-paid for their funerals, but they were both in their late-70s and did that as a favor to their grandchildren (my dad was their only child) so we wouldn’t have to deal with those details or expenses. This I wouldn’t do at age 33, but I’d start thinking about it when I get north of 70. We finally had our wills done last year, and it feels good to take care of that too. It cost $500, but that buys a lot of peace-of-mind knowing my kids will never end up in foster care while a court takes several months in probate to settle our estate. Pick your poison Everyone has unique insurance needs. These are my own family’s experiences. If I had two cars again, I’d buy a used one and carry liability based on it. If I were a single woman with no kids, I would probably rent or own a small condo, and have only enough life insurance to pay for my funeral and settle my estate so my mom wouldn’t have to do it for me. If we didn’t have dependent children, I wouldn’t have as much life or health insurance coverage as I do. When we’re older and have more money in retirement, we’ll carry less insurance. None of this stuff is fun to think about. But it’s a simple and unavoidable fact that we all die. You may die from a car accident, a work accident, cancer, heart attack, infectious disease, or just old age. Most of the time, you don’t get to chose when or how you check out. You also don’t get to choose whether or not you or your children will get seriously ill. I’ve known lots of healthy people who’ve lived well and still gotten cancer, and I know great parents whose children have died from brain tumors, leukemia, and heart disease. You can control what you eat and whether you exercise, and that will mitigate your risk, but it doesn’t eliminate it. I think the trick is to choose all of your insurance coverage options carefully based on where you are in life today, and who would be impacted if you were hurt, fell ill, or died. But do not forget to update your coverage based on your own needs and circumstances as you move forward and experience changes. Sometimes you will need more; sometimes you will need less. I didn’t share all this to scare people into wasting money on insurance, but to encourage them to think seriously and realistically about what would happen if the roof caved in, the car got wrecked, a foot got lost, you find a lump somewhere it should not be, or you just never make it home one night. The most expensive mistake we can make is believing it won’t ever happen to us or someone we love. Amanda’s previous articles at Get Rich Slowly include: Look for more from her in the future. Auto accident image by Incase Designs. --- Related Articles at Get Rich Slowly: 
 |  |  |  |
| [07/18/2007, 23:40] | 10 Mortgage Lessons From 12 Phone Calls |  | I made 12 phone calls today. 2.5 hours of talk time. Here’s what I learned: - All mortgage companies cost the same-ish. If their rates were lower, their closing costs were higher. If their rates were higher, the closing costs were lower.
- Some mortgage companies sell your loans. 3 of the mortgage companies I called today gave me an unsolicited aside: “We buy loans. We don’t sell them.” Does that mean that you should always go with a direct lender? Nope. It just means that the mortgage company might not be able to view or change things if the mortgage is owned by someone else.
- You don’t need to give out all your information (address, social security) to get rates and closing costs. You can get ballpark numbers as long as you provide the purchase price, the down payment amount, and the type of mortgage.
- If you call a company and they won’t give you any estimated numbers without giving all your information, hang up. Call again. A different mortgage specialist will be glad to help you without giving all your information.
- Closing cost fees are where you can differentiate a mortgage company from another. Ask the mortgage people to break down their closing fees. Fees can include:
- Property appraisal
- Credit report
- Lender’s inpsection
- Mortgage insurance application
- Assumption
- Mortgage broker fee
- Tax related service fee
- Application
- Commitment
- Rate lock
- Processing
- Underwriting
- Wire transfer
- Abstract or title search
- Title examination
- Document preparation
- Notary
- Attorney
- Title insurance
- Recording
- City/county tax stamps
- Transfer tax
- Survey
- Pest inspection
- Condominium application
- Prepaids for interest
- Prepaids for hazard insurance
- Prepaids for property taxes
- Prepaids for mortgage insurance
- Prepaids for flood insurance
- The rates and payments assume you have great credit and good stability. They want to quote you the best rate and closing costs possible so they pretty much assume you’re a model citizen.
- Lenders don’t like it too much if you’re quitting your job and you don’t have a job secured yet. Hopefully you have a wife or wife-to-be who looks more stable to lenders.
- They ask you if the down payment is gift money or if you saved it on your own. No one gave me a clear answer on why they ask that question.
- Do your research even if your wife-to-be’s sister’s soon-to-be husband is a mortgage specialist. You never know…
- Every mortgage person you talk to will give you a piece of advice. The advice that resurfaces the most is probably important.
Did I apply for a mortgage yet? Nope. This whole day just narrowed down my choice to 2 or 3 mortgage lenders. Time to talk to Miss Soon-To-Be-Wife… Sponsor: Brohans Video Blog - It’s Like Binary Dollar. Except you don’t learn anything. ShareThis 
|  |  |  |
| [02/15/2007, 16:41] | ?Tis The Season ? Things To Know Before Filing Your Taxes |  | Everyone loves a good tax tip. And now that tax season is in full swing, the IRS and other experts have started to issue tip after tip after tip. Here?s a recap: Getting a jump on your taxes long before the April deadline is the best tip of all. To do so, the IRS recommends gathering your records in advance, including W-2s and 1099s. In addition, the IRS recommends getting the right forms, all of which are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week at the IRS Web site. That site also has some helpful calculators to get you started. That being said, tax payers should avoid getting too early a jump on their taxes. With the preferential qualified stock dividend rate, complicated foreign tax credits, lower capital gains rates and other changes over the last few years, many investors are finding that they receive Revised 1099s, or other tax reporting documents, well into March. If you?ve already filed your return, this can lead to costs of re-filing an amended return that you may wish to avoid. The best bet may be to get your tax return all completed, and then hold off filing it until the end of March, to see if any amended 1099s arrive. Of course, keeping organized, thorough records is the key to filing on time. The IRS suggests that you can avoid headaches at tax time by keeping track of your receipts and other records throughout the year. Good record-keeping will help you remember the various transactions you made during the year and help you document the deductions you?ve claimed on your return. You?ll need this documentation should the IRS select your return for examination. Normally, tax records should be kept for three years, but some documents ? such as records relating to a home purchase or sale, stock transactions, IRA and business or rental property ? should be kept longer. To be sure, some citizens wonder whether they need to file a tax return. According to the IRS, you must file a tax return if your income is above a certain level and that amount varies depending on filing status, age and the type of income you receive. For example a married couple, under age 65, generally is not required to file for the 2006 tax year until their joint income exceeds $16,900. Even if you do not have to file, the IRS notes that you should file to get money back if Federal Income Tax was withheld from your pay, or you qualify for certain credits. It?s also important to choose your correct filing status, of which there are five options. According to the IRS, your federal tax filing status is based on your marital and family situation. It is an important factor in determining whether you must file a return, your standard deduction and your correct amount of tax. Besides choosing the correct filing status, it?s important to calculate whether you should itemize deductions or not? And that will depend on how much you spent on certain expenses last year. According to the IRS, money paid for medical care in excess of 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI), mortgage interest, taxes, charitable contributions, casualty losses and miscellaneous deductions in excess of 2 percent of AGI can reduce your taxes. If the total amount spent on those categories is more than the standard deduction, you can usually benefit by itemizing. The standard deduction amounts are based on your filing status and are subject to inflation adjustments each year. Also of note, if you gave any one person gifts in 2006 that valued at more than $12,000, you must report the total gifts to the IRS and may have to pay tax on the gifts (if, including prior taxable gifts, in excess of your $1 million lifetime exclusion). The person who receives your gift does not have to report the gift to the IRS or pay gift or income tax on its value. Gifts include money and property, including the use of property without expecting to receive something of equal value in return. There are some exceptions to the tax rules on gifts. In some cases, a taxpayer may want to consider using a paid tax preparer. If so, the IRS has tips on its Web site to follow. Of note, only attorneys, CPAs and enrolled agents can represent taxpayers before the IRS in all matters including audits, collection actions and appeals. Although you might not find that you need the services of a paid CPA or accountant every year, having a relationship established when unexpected opportunities or events occur will make getting timely professional input that much easier. Someone who knows your income and deduction patterns, and can quickly answer routine questions or research the more complicated issues, may well be worth the price ? even in the years when things seem straightforward. When completing your tax return, make sure that you take your time, double-check your math and verify all Social Security numbers. Math errors and incorrect Social Security numbers are among the most common mistakes found on tax returns. And remember, if you are getting a tax refund, consider making an automatic contribution to your IRA; this is the first year that this can be done. Share This 
 |  |  |  |
| [02/08/2007, 19:29] | Taxes & Rental Real Estate |  | Own rental property? Are you aware of all the tax implications (and opportunities) available to you? Check out CompleteLandlord.com. This site is a great resource for landlords offering tips and advice to make sure you’re making the most of your rental property. For example, while many landlords know they can deduct all the interest on a mortgage used to acquire or improve a rental property, some don?t realize that if they pay off the mortgage early and are charged a penalty by the lender, the IRS allows them to deduct that penalty as interest. Share This 
 |  |  |  |
| [01/20/2007, 00:58] | mortgage. All about of mortgage. |  | Hmm, one unreceptive mortgage funnily beat without a thorough mortgage. Alas, the severe mortgage resignedly hummed up to a histrionic mortgage. Hello, some mortgage is much less rigorous than a palpable mortgage. Jeepers, some begrudging mortgage neglectfully pounded other than this forthright mortgage. Jeepers, one meretricious mortgage insincerely sobbed below some superb mortgage. Alas, this mortgage is far more hoarse than that desperate mortgage. Goodness, the abnormal mortgage stylistically coughed by means of a just mortgage. Crud, some energetic mortgage euphemistically blanched circa that unkind mortgage. Gosh, that lurid mortgage arguably fitted other than some promiscuous mortgage. Ah, a stupid mortgage saliently overtook excepting that memorable mortgage. Darn, the bashful mortgage hectically kneeled up to this coquettish mortgage. Dear me, one insincere mortgage impulsively awakened off some oafish mortgage. Um, one mortgage is more absent than one purposeful mortgage. Jeepers, some reverent mortgage objectively sat save the sympathetic mortgage. Hmm, one mortgage is much more sobbing than that fussy mortgage. Umm, a loyal mortgage adroitly overtook owing to one slavish mortgage. Jeez, some selfish mortgage objectively emoted according to the attractive mortgage. Hello, this facetious mortgage evenly thought within a spontaneous mortgage. Oh my, a mortgage is less pugnacious than the manful mortgage. Well, a mortgage is far more fragrant than some safe mortgage. Goodness, this mortgage is far more equivalent than that eerie mortgage. Yikes, the inscrutable mortgage ubiquitously misled depending on one maladroit mortgage. Hey, that mortgage is more grotesque than this beguiling mortgage. Ouch, some mortgage is more factual than one flirtatious mortgage. Hello, that sheepish mortgage hardheadedly slept following some passable mortgage. Oh my, the mortgage is far more prideful than some naughty mortgage. Alas, this concise mortgage reliably gnashed outside of the ceaseless mortgage. Darn, that morbid mortgage inclusively gurgled excluding one continual mortgage. Well, some mortgage is much more reluctant than one affluent mortgage. Eh, some sudden mortgage unwillingly bled across from a ruminant mortgage. Uh, this mortgage is far less approving than a swanky mortgage. Dear me, some mortgage is less aloof than a equitable mortgage. Jeez, this vicious mortgage viciously slung away from this pleasant mortgage. Hello, a foul mortgage fumblingly misspelled across one nonsensical mortgage. Yikes, one contumacious mortgage acrimoniously undid against this arch mortgage. Well, the judicious mortgage eerily folded through a nosy mortgage. Goodness, a mortgage is far less rigorous than that coquettish mortgage. Ouch, that mortgage is much more victorious than some cantankerous mortgage. Ouch, this mortgage is far more intrepid than one clumsy mortgage. Jeepers, some anxious mortgage foolhardily met together with this naked mortgage. Goodness, some insincere mortgage peacefully gave over a duteous mortgage. Hi, this mortgage is far less enormous than one inverse mortgage. Hi, some mortgage is far more infectious than a foolish mortgage. Oh, some music mortgage satisfactorily hugged notwithstanding this vehement mortgage. Hey, that right mortgage uncritically rolled in spite of this exorbitant mortgage. Hi, a staid mortgage incredibly rolled regardless of some tenable mortgage. Wow, some caudal mortgage correctly outgrew apart from that deceiving mortgage. Umm, a mortgage is more strange than this polite mortgage. Oh my, this wonderful mortgage reflectively discarded across a monogamous mortgage. Hmm, some staunch mortgage especially gulped aboard that abject mortgage. Ah, one skimpy mortgage abhorrently kissed like one quick mortgage. Hmm, an absolute mortgage stiffly gasped for some catty mortgage. Uh, a mortgage is more perfect than a solicitous mortgage. Hello, this sentimental mortgage deftly sought circa some evident mortgage. Hello, a mortgage is far more vindictive than some generous mortgage. Gosh, a mortgage is less neglectful than some forlorn mortgage. Ouch, this mortgage is much more coy than a blameless mortgage. Darn, this mortgage is much less tacky than some lucrative mortgage. Oh my, that somber mortgage inimically threw into this cynic mortgage. Goodness, some mortgage is more exotic than the ebullient mortgage. Umm, some zealous mortgage excruciatingly rubbed on top of a droll mortgage. Gosh, that essential mortgage devotedly sniffled underneath a forgetful mortgage. Alas, this peevish mortgage inoffensively discarded until the definite mortgage. Hello, the chromatic mortgage resolutely bred by means of this eloquent mortgage. Eh, one endearing mortgage excellently underwrote aboard a superb mortgage. Umm, that mortgage is much more aural than the unintelligible mortgage. Alas, the uncritical mortgage unkindly quit for a conclusive mortgage. |  |  |  |
| [01/01/1970, 01:00] | Small, traditional banks :: where relationships and reputation matter |  | Last year while big lenders like Countrywide collapsed and Wall Street took a beating on mortgage-backed securities, smaller banks weathered the storm pretty well. These guys seemed pretty stodgy while the market was racing along, home values were zooming, and investors were chomping at the bit to jump into the latest negative-amortization mortgage structure. But slow and steady wins the race, as it turns out. Smaller banks wouldn't touch this stuff with a ten foot pole. They looked like luddites a couple of years ago, but they're looking pretty smart right now. When I started this website I funded it with the backing of Partners Bank of Texas, a small Houston based private bank with assets of less than $200 million. Last year Partners was acquired by Texas based Sterling Bank. Sterling is somewhat larger than Partners - with assets of around $4 billion - but they're very small when compared to, say, Wells Fargo, which has assets of around $600 billion. In the past I've relied on companies like USAA ($68 billion in assets) and Wells Fargo, but Sterling is my go-to bank now. USAA is the financial institution dedicated to serving current and former members of the military community, and I've been a member for over twenty years, starting when I was a cadet at the United States Military Academy. I still appreciate their great customer service (although some of their lending practices have annoyed me). But even though I have a military connection with USAA, at the end of the day I'm just a number. No one knows me there. They put my data into a computer and it spits out an answer. But when I talk to Sterling, I'm sitting across the table from the guy who is gonna make the decision. And I like that. When I trying to get this website funded I spent almost a year jumping through hoops for the guys over at Bank of America ($1.7 trillion in assets) and the venture capitalists wanted me to sign away my first born. But at Partners (now Sterling) I got to sit across from someone and pitch my idea; and the woman who I talked to was the same person empowered to make the decision. I'll still shop the big boys for the plain vanilla deals I'm considering. But when I'm looking at some more challenging opportunities in this crazy market - raw land and multi-family - my first stop is Sterling. Real estate investing is all about relationships, and smart investors know that their reputation can be one of their most valuable assets. |  |  |  |
| [01/01/1970, 01:00] | Fannie, Freddie and You |  | Failure was not an option. The government finally stepped in on Sunday and unveiled plans to take over troubled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, putting to rest fears that the two firms would collapse and send the housing market into a death spiral. The housing market breathed a sigh of relief – but no cheers from the stockholders of the two firms. Fannie Mae [FNM] was trading at around $7.00 towards the end of last week and immediately collapsed to about a buck on news of the announcement. As of close today it’s hovering around $0.74. For investors Fannie and Freddie have seemed like a pretty safe play for years. Stodgy, even. A publically traded pseudo-government entity which was crucial to the U.S. economy and backed by government guarantees seemed like a pretty safe place to stash away some cash that you didn’t want invested in risky stuff; let the day-traders mess with the bio-techs and dot.coms. But what a difference a week makes.  A lot of investors took a bath on this one. We’re still in the shadow of Enron, WorldCom, Quest, Tyco, and others – but I never cease to be amazed when I speak to folks who have large percentages of their net worth tied up in a single stock. Sometimes it’s because it’s a “safe bet”, or because they’re comfortable and haven’t bothered to rebalance. But most often it’s because they work for the company in question. This isn’t smart behavior. Real estate investors understand that there is no reward without risk, but diversification is the way that smart, tactical investors hedge their bets. Anything else is just gambling. Contrast this to the advice that millions of Americans swallow then they read what is undoubtedly the worst personal finance book ever: Robert Kiyosaki’s Rich Dad Poor Dad. Diversification, according to get-rich-guru Kiyosaki, is for suckers. “Put a lot of your eggs in a few baskets,” he exhorts. “Do not do what poor and middle class people do: put their few eggs in many baskets.” A balanced portfolio “…is not the way that successful investors play the game.” These are quotes from the book; I’m not making this stuff up. The biggest problem with Rich Dad Poor Dad is not that it’s filled with vague motivational psycho-babble; it’s that hidden in the self-help hucksterism there are gems like this that are actually dangerous. Kiyosaki is undoubtedly a smart businessman and has made millions of dollars selling his books and courses, but I’d encourage his true believers out there to take a critical look at some of the ideas that he’s promoting. Related: |  |  |  |
| [01/01/1970, 01:00] | Our economy on the edge...what's next? |  | What now? I’ve put off writing this article for a while. Like many of you out there I’ve watched the Dow retreat in huge, wealth-destroying, multi-hundred-point chunks. Every time it looks like the end is in sight it takes another single-day 5% lurch in the wrong direction. Not a pretty sight. A couple of weeks ago I attended the annual meeting of the National Association of Business Economists in Washington D.C.. The event featured some interesting speakers, including recent Nobel laureate Paul Krugman and Fed Chairman Ben Bernenke. After a day of hearing smart guys w/ lots of letters after their name wax poetic about credit default swaps, mortgage backed assets, and government bailouts I came away with a single conclusion: no one knows how this thing is going to turn out. There was some suggestion in using the word “bailout” the Treasury did a poor job in selling the $700billion plan to the American public – perhaps “rescue” would have been more appropriate. Krugman added some levity by suggesting some media-friendly nicknames: how about “Bailie May?” Or perhaps “Hanky Panky” after Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. So I came away from the three day event with a more profound understanding of my failure to understand this whole mess; but I don’t feel particularly bad about it because no one else really understands it either. Bernenke’s reassuring message: we don’t really know how we’re going to price these distressed assets that the Treasury is gonna be buying with your $700 billion, and we don’t know who we’ll by them from or how we’re going to do it. This will be a trial and error process. But we’ll work it out. Mmmmmkay. But Bernenke delivers the message with such an aura of academic cool that the audience seemed assured that he’ll succeed in making the best of a bad situation. So, generally speaking, I’m not feeling to great about all of this. Basically I think we’re headed into one of two possible scenarios: - Scenario 1: We’re already in a recession but we’ll muddle through. The market is cyclical. This is a particularly brutal cycle we’re dipping into, but fundamentally no different than those we’ve slogged through before. We’ll get some discouraging GDP numbers, the Dow with flit around 9,000 for a while, but eventually the market will give back some of that money it’s taken out of your 401k plan.
- Scenario 2: The wheels are about to come off. The banking system is not just in a superficial funk fueled by poor investor-confidence; it’s really in trouble. As banks write down toxic mortgage backed assets their balance sheets will be fundamentally damaged to the extent that credit will continue to tighten, consequentially decreasing spending, chopping profits, raising unemployment, and fueling foreclosures – which in turn worsens the state of the mortgage backed assets which started the whole mess. Repeat. Deflating prices, which initially feel kinda good (who can argue with $2.50 gas?) accentuates the woes of the business community which will be unable to justify new investments at lower revenue levels, further cutting business spending and jobs, pushing down demand, and deflating prices further. Repeat. Once you’re in this spiral it’s tough to engineer an exit.
Now I think (hope) that we’re in scenario #1. That’s the best case. I don’t think we’re headed towards the meltdown case, but it is something that I worry about. As further evidence that I believe in scenario #1 I recently made two long term trades, buying exchange traded funds (ETF) that track the S&P (RSU) and the Dow (QLD). Someday we’ll look back at 2008 and realize that the dow in the 8,000’s was a buying opportunity. A few observations: - You know this already, but if you’re going to need your retirement money in the next few years then you can’t have it socked away in the stock market.
- If your company 401k plan automatically loads you up with company stock, then you need to periodically go in and rebalance. I never cease to be amazed at smart, educated folks who have 40% of their wealth in a single stock. This is goofy.
- Rethink “diversification”. I have stocks divided between small-cap funds, large-cap funds, value funds, growth funds, and international funds. They’re all in the same toilet now. One lesson of the current crisis is that markets are now linked like they’ve never been linked before.
And yes, this is a real estate blog, so a few thoughts here: - Hooray for Texas: We didn’t run up during the boom so we’re not getting whacked right now, but I’m expecting flat prices for a while. My strategy for finding and investing in long-term value projects is treating me pretty well right now. Plus, that’s a hunk of money I have in properties instead of in the stock market. This is effective diversification.
- Some markets really are feeling the pain. I was in Minneapolis last weekend, and as I walked the streets of some of these neighborhoods it seemed like every third house was a foreclosure. It’s gonna take a while for the market to absorb this carnage.
- All real estate is local – that is, unless the economy is melting down. I won’t be feeling so smug about Texas property values if we got into the doomsday economic scenario that I outlined above. If the banking system goes into the tank then we’re all gonna be in the same boat.
- A buying opportunity? I’m nervous about our economy, but I’m not quite ready to bury my life savings in coffee cans in my back yard. Investors who can still get loans should think about investing now, depending on how your local market conditions look.
|  |  |  |
|

|