As I mentioned on Monday, May brought the highest numbers of visitors this site has seen so far.  I decided to take a look at what people were most interested in over the course of the month.

Tracking your stimulus check was the most popular article, there must be a lot of people waiting to get their rebate money.

Gas prices are obviously on everyone’s mind, the topics of riding the bus to save gas money, different ways to save gas money commuting to work, and the best gas credit cards were popular with readers as well.

The series on personal finance issues for college graduates has garnered alot of interest from former college students entering the working world for the first time this summer.

People are getting ready for their summer trips and have found the saving money on vacation series useful in making their preparations.  This one is only partially complete with several more articles on the topic coming up soon.

With high gas prices, people must be looking for more in home entertainment. Saving money on online movie rentals with a free trial of Blockbuster Total Access was another popular one for the month.

Here are some of the more popular articles from The Money Writers during the month of May:

• Investing in the Stock Market Over the Past 10 Years: How Did Dollar-Cost Averaging Fare?
• how to make money without a job and why you should
• Frugal Tips I Can’t (or Won’t) Do
• Save Money on Gas Tips from Consumer Reports
• The Future of Personal Finance Tools
• Is Investing In Rental Property A Good Move?
• Why your Retirement Account is NOT an Emergency Fund

One of my favorite saving techniques is the use of targeted accounts. If I want to save for something big — like a Mini Cooper, for example — I’ll open a new savings account specifically for this purpose. I first learned about this method from Robert Pagliarini’s The Six-Day Financial Makeover:

Traditionally, most people invested for various vague goals and lumped all of their savings together in a single investment account. That?s pretty boring. It?s not very inspiring or effective. Purpose-Driven Investing satisfies our need for a purpose and our need for instant gratification by thinking of each of our goals as a separate ?basket?. Each of our baskets represents a single goal with a clear purpose that we can see and grow.

What does this mean in the real world? It means that we have a single investment account for every goal. For example, if one of your goals is to take the family on a European vacation, create a separate savings account called ?Family European Vacation Fund?. This account or basket contains all of your savings toward that one goal. Every penny in the account is for the European vacation — not for retirement, a new car, your emergency fund, your kids? college tuition, or any other goal.

I like this idea, and have been using it ever since I saved for my Nintendo Wii.

Until recently, I kept my targeted savings accounts at the local credit union where they earned me a paltry 0.35%. For the past few months, Get Rich Slowly readers have been urging me to move all of my savings to ING Direct, which is where I keep my emergency fund. “It’s easy,” my readers tell me. “You can open multiple accounts, give them any name you want, and track them all from the same screen. You can even open a checking account!”

Last month, I finally overcame inertia to try this myself. My readers were right: opening multiple accounts at ING Direct is easy. (It’s probably easy at HSBC Direct and many other online banks, as well.)

Step one: Choose an account
First, I logged into my ING Direct account summary page. From there, I clicked the big “Open an Account” button.

I was directed to a page listing a variety of available accounts, including business and retirement accounts. Because I wanted to open another savings account, that’s the option I selected.

On the next screen, I was asked to further refine the account type:

Step two: Fund the account
Next came the good part: I selected how much I wanted to put into the account and where those funds would come from. I was also able to give the new account a nickname. Since I was opening these extra accounts specifically for targeted saving, it makes sense to name each one based on my goal.

Finally, I had to agree to the terms and conditions of the account.

Step three: Wait
Then the waiting began. Because ING Direct had to “pull” the money from my credit union, it took several days for the cash to transfer to my accounts. At first they appeared empty:

After the money had transferred, it was easy for me to track all of my savings goals in one place.

Next on my list? Exploring ING Direct’s certificates of deposit and business accounts.

A useful tool
Thank you to all of the readers who suggested this. I don’t know why I took so long to try it. I’m sure this technique isn’t limited to ING Direct. I was doing something similar at my local credit union (though without the pretty interface, account nicknames, or high interest rates), so I suspect that other online banks offer similar functionality.

Not everyone needs multiple accounts to save for goals. My wife, for example, is perfectly content with a single gigantic savings account for everything. But for me, being able to separate funds like this is awesome. It keeps me motivated to save. And because it doesn’t cost me a penny, I’m happy to do it.

Note: This article was originally scheduled to appear on June 12th, but Trent at The Simple Dollar posted his handy (and similar) guide to budgeting with an online bank that day, so I delayed my story for a few weeks.

---
Related Articles at Get Rich Slowly:

• Use a Freedom Account to Prepare for the Unexpected
• Which Online High-Yield Savings Account is Best?
• The Official GRS Referral Swapping Thread
• Optimize Your Bank Accounts with a Periodic Review
• What are Your Experiences with Internet Banking?

After a little over a year of constant downturns in the economy and stock markets, some discussion is coming to light in terms of people reconsidering what retirement means, and how they are going to get there. I know I’ve seen this in my practice, as I’m encountering many more people who are approaching retirement in 10 years or less and they are seriously thinking about extending how long they work, or even changing their retirement plans.

It’s understandable that if you’re just a few years from retirement and you had a large stake in the stock market, the losses experienced this year are enough to rattle even investors who are typically risk adverse. But, what about the younger generation that typically reads this site? The bulk of readers here are in the 25-45 year old range, which puts a typical retirement at anywhere from 20-40 years away. With a longer time horizon, I wonder if the recent economic climate has forced younger people to begin thinking more critically about their retirement expectations.

Is retirement still too far off to really worry about at this point? Are you reconsidering how your investments for retirement are structured after what’s happened? Do you plan on working longer, or change your retirement goals?

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post’s poll.

Poll: Have Recent Economic Conditions Changed Your Expectations for Retirement?

If you place a charge of $5,000 on your credit card and only make the minimum payment each month, the chart above shows you how long it will take you to finally pay it off and how much interest you’ll end up paying.

- Edwin, CashTheChecks.com

Although many small businesses begin with only one or two members of staff - the founders - most growing businesses quickly recognise the need to create a larger team. Not only can this spread the workload but a well-selected team can bring in more energy, creativity, drive and knowledge than the founder alone might possess. A small, closely-knit, highly motivated team can be an unstoppable driving force.

The authors of The Beermat Entrepreneur call the members of this core team 'cornerstones'. They suggest that the ideal mix is one entrepreneur providing strong leadership, surrounded by four 'cornerstones' - one for sale, one for finance, one for product development and one for project delivery and customer service. In real terms, most small businesses cannot afford such a big team, and don't really need it to begin with. However, even bringing one other person in to the business can make a huge difference to its success during the first year or so.

In many cases, the original team will be composed of the founder, or founders, and one or two relatives or friends who have been roped in along the way. This works well if everyone is committed to the success of the business and prepared to work hard. As we've seen the early days of a business are defined by long hours and a painfully demanding workload - there is no room for the half-hearted or unenthusiastic. Not only will they not pull their weight, but they will sap everyone else's enthusiasm too.

I've heard it said 'never work with friends or relatives' and it's true that in some cases this leads to disaster. However, a team who like each other - and have a friendship beyond the business - can also be extremely efficient and powerful.

Jude, Business adviser

Remember that just because you enjoy spending time with someone socially it doesn't mean you will like working with them. Ask yourself what they would be like to work with. Are they hardworking? Enthusiastic? What do they have to offer your business? Try to find people whose skills compliment yours, who can bring something to the business that fills 'gaps'. For instance, if you are fantastic on the finances but weak on marketing, you need to find someone who can bring something extra to the marketing side of the business.

A recent London Business School survey of CEOs found that they considered the major factor that had contributed to the success of their businesses was 'selecting the right people with good attitudes who are loyal to the company and who want to excel in their careers'.

Defining Roles

Whether you decide to go into business with others as equals or you employ them as part of your original team, it is very important to define roles carefully. Everyone needs to know what is expected of them and where the boundaries of their 'area' lie. In businesses with two or more equal partners a lack of clarity about roles can be a major source of conflict, taking up valuable time that might be better spent focused on other aspects of the business. If you have a management team, you need to give them space to fulfil their roles and feel that their contribution is valued. This doesn't mean handing over control, final decisions will still rest with you (or if they don't you need to be clear about exactly who is the boss - only one person should take this position or squabbling and infighting can result).

Consider the following key roles and divide them between your core team. You should all be clear on who is going to take each role.

Business leader - who takes the final decisions? In other words, the boss.

Sales person - who sells to your customers? Identifies customers and carries out your customer research?

Finance person - who manages the money and the associated administrative work?

Supply management - who locates suppliers, negotiates with them and maintains adequate supply levels.

Core business - who does the core tasks of your business, by which we mean the things that your business is actually about? This might mean making a product, providing a service or something else.

Marketing and PR person - who promotes your business to potential customers and raises the profile of your business?

Some of these roles overlap, so good communication is also of key importance to your business.

Importance of Role Clarification

People do either one of two things in a business - they either add value or they add cost. There are no grey areas.

One of the most important ways to ensure that your core team members are all adding value is to help them clarify their roles.

There are a number of different aspects to role clarification:

Prescribed role - This is what the business uses to set down the individual's overall goals and objectives. It is usually called a 'job description' or something similar and it sets out the person's responsibilities, authority, and key tasks, as well as their position in the business hierarchy.

While this is a useful starting point, it does not take account of personal differences and changes in circumstances such as growth of the business or the need to cover weak performances by others.

Personalised role - the prescribed role is only part of the picture. These are factors internal to the individual which will affect the way he or she performs in the role.

This includes their abilities, skills and strengths, as well as their expectations of the role, their assumptions (about the role, the business, the sector. etc.), their values and ambitions.

Perceived role - the perceptions and expectations of others in the business will have an impact on the individual. For example, they will have their own views on what the priorities of the role should be as well as the boundaries: 'I don't think Sales Managers should...'; 'I expect you to...' These can limit or restrict the way a person performs, but if expectations are high and positive they can raise the person's game, enabling them to perform to their full potential within their current role.

From the Business Team at Learning Curve; offering a range of unique development programmes for small businesses.

About the Author

Director of Studies at Learning Curve Home Study, one of the UK's leading distance learning providers. Learning Curve offers home study courses in a range of subjects, including Business development courses.

We’re nearly midway through December already. That means 2009 is just around the corner. In the spirit of the new year, I’d like to ask:

What are your 2009 Financial Goals?

Here are mine in order of importance:

1. MAX OUT my wife’s 401(k). We haven’t maxed out her 401(k) in years. The market’s down so it’s the PERFECT time to get back into the habit. The IRS raised the employee contribution limit to $16,500 for 2009. My wife gets paid twice a month so that means she will be contributing $687.50 per paycheck. Wowza!

On top of that, she’ll also get a generous employer-match of 75% of the first 6%, or 4.50%. The employer-match should easily put her over the $20,000 contribution mark for the year (and maybe even closer to $25,000 if we get profit-sharing).

2. Recommit to our budget. I know, I know,…we should already be doing this. However, I got kind of lazy and complacent and haven’t stuck to our budget. We make decent money so it’s really silly of us not to using our income wisely. We do save money each month but we could do a lot better with some discipline.

3. Continue building up our emergency fund. Our efund is nowhere near where I’d like it to be. So, the third goal for 2009 is to get it to $10,000.

Those are my financial goals. What are yours?

ShareThis

As things stand in early 2007, estate and generation skipping (GST) taxes will be repealed in 2010 and reinstated in 2011. And given that Democrats now have control of the House and the Senate, experts are predicting that the permanent repeal of the estate tax is unlikely in the next two years.

At present, for 2007 and 2008, the estate tax exemption is $2 million per person, rising to $3.5 million in 2009, repealed in 2010, and then the tax returns in 2011 with an exemption of $1 million. Given existing laws, experts suggest that using life insurance to pay for potential estate taxes is a very viable solution.

According to industry reports, the number one product sold for estate liquidity today is universal life with a secondary guarantee. In short, this is a policy whereby insurers guarantee the insurance benefit on a universal life insurance policy even if the cash value in the policy goes to zero. This is known as a ?secondary guarantee.? The policy owner agrees to pay a premium which is often less than a whole life insurance premium and if the policy owner keeps-up payments, the policy?s death benefit is guaranteed to age 100.

Policies with secondary guarantees are often used for estate planning where the crucial component is a guarantee of the death benefit and cash value build-up is secondary.

Survivorship life insurance (also called joint and survivor life insurance or second-to-die life insurance) can also be used for estate planning to create the cash liquidity to pay the estate taxes. However, in order for the insurance death benefit to avoid both income and estate tax, the policy must be set-up properly within an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT).

So what in general is universal life, what are its advantages and disadvantages, and when should it be used? According to Tools and Techniques of Life Insurance Planning, universal life ? which was first introduced in the late 1970s — is often referred to as a ?flexible premium,? ?current assumption,? ?adjustable-death-benefit? type of cash value policy. It?s flexible premium because the policy owner can pay whatever premium they wish within a given range and adjust later as needed. Policy owners can even skip premium payments provided there?s enough cash value in the policy to cover policy charges. It?s called a current assumption because current interest rates and current mortality and expense charges are used to determine the cash value of the policy. And it?s called an adjustable death benefit because the policy owner can lower the death benefit at anytime and can raise it with evidence of insurability.

Given this flexibility, universal life is a useful product should a person?s estate tax liability rise or fall with the Congressional tides. Typically, a universal life is best suited for long-term coverage needs; while a non-renewable term policy will generally be more cost-effective for short-term needs. Generally, however, such policies work best when flexibility is needed and policy owners need to reconfigure their premiums or death benefits.

According to some planners, the biggest advantage of using guaranteed universal life is this: The policy owner pays the least expensive premiums to guarantee a lifetime death benefit. The policy owner can also adjust the premium. If, for instance, there?s enough cash value to cover the mortality charges, the policy owner could even skip premium payments.

However, caution should be followed in skipping or delaying payments on these contracts since the ?guarantees? could be impacted. Even premiums received during the grace period could affect the accumulated values and ?guarantees.? Policies differ on this and need to be reviewed before any change is to be made.

The policy is also transparent ? the policy illustrations and annual reports break out and report each element of the policy, such as premium, death benefit, interest credits, mortality charges, expenses and cash value, separately.

Universal life policies also offer two death benefit options, one that is similar to a traditional whole life policy and one that is like a traditional whole life policy with a term rider. The first, a level death benefit; the latter, an increasing death benefit.

When selecting a universal life policy, it?s especially important to consider the amount credited to cash values. The prospective policy owner should know how the insurer determines the amount credited to cash values. The amount credited to cash values depends on the expenses charged against the policy, the mortality charges assessed against the policy, net investment yield earned by the insurer on its portfolio investments and the method used to allocate interest to various blocks of policies.

Share This

Andrew Lahde, manager of a hedge fund that profited enormously by speculating on the failure of firms that made major bets on sub-prime mortgages, has called it quits.

His "so long, and thanks for the fish" comes in the form of this letter.

Enjoy.

INDYMAC IS OFFICALLY CLOSED!!!

In the past minutes newswires around the country and world are now reporting that the Federal Government has shut down IndyMac Bank and has handed it to the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) as conservator.

Couple the shut down with the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac troubles, and we’re in for some really rocky waters next week. I’m willing to bet a lot of money that the announcement was held back from being made prior to the close of the stock market because of fears of a massive crash. Well . . . I think we’ll be seeing that happen this coming Monday!

Fasten your seat belts, people . . . we’re in for a ROCKY RIDE!

IndyMac Bank’s assets were seized by federal regulators on Friday after the mortgage lender succumbed to the pressures of tighter credit, tumbling home prices and rising foreclosures.

The bank is the largest regulated thrift to fail and the second largest financial institution to close in U.S. history, regulators said.

Yahoo Finance

In the biggest bank failure of the housing downturn to date, federal banking regulators today closed IndyMac Bank FSB, naming the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. as conservator.

The FDIC said it will transfer insured deposits and “substantially all the assets” of IndyMac Bank, to a newly created successor, IndyMac Federal Bank, which will be operated by the FDIC.

Insured depositors and borrowers will automatically become customers of IndyMac Federal, FSB and will continue to have uninterrupted customer service and access to their funds by ATM, debit cards and writing checks. Depositors of IndyMac Federal Bank FSB will have no access to online and phone banking services this weekend, but will regain access to them on Monday.

Inman News

IndyMac Bancorp Inc. became the second-biggest federally insured financial company to fail today after a run by depositors left the California mortgage lender short on cash.

The Pasadena, California-based bank specialized in so-called Alt-A mortgages, which didn’t require borrowers to provide documentation on their incomes. Its home state has been among the hardest hit by foreclosures.

Bloomberg

What’s next? Anyone?

Advertisement: Payday Loans Online from the leader in online cash advances since 2003.

This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

BREAKING: IndyMac Bank is Shut Down and Taken Over by Feds

Those who run real estate investment clubs have a big challenge in lining up speakers for each meeting.  Clubs do not usually have the kind of budget that would allow them to pay for speakers, therefore they need to do their best to locate those that will speak for free.  This invariably results in the talk being given by someone who has a specific agenda or something to sell.  This is not necessarily a bad thing, you just need to keep the speakers ultimate motivation in mind when you listen to the spiel.

Some of these speakers are quite good and their knowledge is obvious.  On the other hand, some of the speakers leave you scratching your head and wondering if they have ever owned an investment property.  Investing veterans have little difficulty in separating the fakes from those who are the real deal.  Novice investors may mistakenly assume that if someone is speaking to a group he must know something.  Hopefully they will learn before they are burned by one of these phonies. 

 My primary purpose for attending monthly club meetings is for the networking and resulting connections ( see: Getting the Most From Your Real Estate Club ), however I do enjoy hearing from good presenters. My local real estate club had two very well qualified speakers at a couple of recent meetings.  While both were very obviously qualified to speak about real estate investing, their styles and agendas were a world apart.  

 Guru #1

At our May 2008 club meeting we had a speaker who specialized in foreclosures.  Certainly a timely topic and on that I was looking to learn more about.  I had seen this speaker once before and knew that he was a good presenter and very knowledgeable.  After introducing himself and providing his background, he openly stated his agenda.  He was not there to sell books, tapes or home-study courses, in fact he didn’t have any of that.  The business model for his company was to purchase bank REO (foreclosures) properties in bulk.  He then sold these properties as-is or after light rehab to investors at wholesale prices.  To do that he needed two things, properties to buy from banks and investors to sell them to.

What he was pitching was a two day seminar on how to locate, buy and finance the acquisition of these properties.  He was charging $1800 for the seminar with the guarantee that he would refund your money after the first day if you didn’t feel it was worth it.  He then proceeded to spend the next hour sharing some of his knowledge of the subject.  He was truly impressive and it was a great example of what you would get in his workshop.  He had over twenty people sign up and most of them were veteran investors who are not easily impressed.

 Guru #2

At our most recent club meeting we had another speaker with impressive credentials.  He is currently featured on one the house flipping shows and has a real estate company on the east coast.  The club heavily promoted the meeting because they do not usually have a name speaker and the resulting attendance was much larger than normal.  Many of the regular meeting segments were cut short to allow this speaker to have as much time as possible.

This speaker had an array of tapes and course material displayed, so his agenda was obvious to anyone who was paying attention.  He began his talk with his background in real estate and talked about all of the mistakes he made when he began.  He kept telling us that he was going to teach us how to do this, that, and the other thing during his talk.  I kept waiting for him to actually “teach” something but all he really did was talk about what he was going to tell us.

As the talk progressed it was laced with sales pitches for a computer program, home-study courses and his five-day boot camp.  Some of the pitches were very subtle while others were blatant commercials.  After 90 minutes he closed with a final pitch for his boot camp.  The regular price was $5,000, but is you signed up now it was only $2,497.  But wait, there’s more! He would include a $500 credit for your travel expenses and the first few people to sign up would receive the $2,000 computer program for $1!

A handful of people did sign up.  From what I saw they were newcomers to the club or novice investors.  None of the veterans were impressed enough to part with their cash. 

The Bottom Line

Both of the gurus were qualified to speak about real estate.  However their value was very different.  One was geared to marketing courses and boot camps to novice investors.  Those who sign up would most likely gain valuable knowledge, but would it really be worth the price?  The second guru was targeting experienced investors with a desire to participate in the foreclosure market.  I spoke to several of the attendees who agreed that there was definite value, but it was not for everyone.

If you are ever inclined to sign up for some gurus course, do so with your eyes wide open.  Is the course geared to someone with your level of experience?  What do you hope to gain from the seminar or boot camp?  Will you be able to implement what you learn or are you just falling for a sales pitch from a smooth-talking speaker? Buyer beware.

The great difficulty in education is to get experience out of ideas.
George Santayana

This Post is from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Blog. Copyright © 2008 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

A Tale of Two Real Estate Gurus

Since reading some comments on my last post, I had been thinking about what this whole deal with “personal finance” is about; is it about making the most amount of money? or is it about saving the most amount of money? or is it about spending the least amount of money? or is it about reducing stress due to money matters? or is it about this obscure concept called “financial freedom”?

The more I think about it, the less specific I get about possible “correct” answers to that question. In fact, looking back at my life, it seems that at different times, a different answer suited me depending on my financial and personal situation at that time.

What came out of this thought process was the realization that personal finance is not just about “maximizing money” - as I used to think earlier - and like most people probably think about it.

It’s not about maximizing. It’s about optimizing.

Given a financial situation, personal finance is about making the best of that situation. Sometimes it means trying to make as much money as you can, and at other times it means trying to make your money work to make you more efficient by reducing your stress, and at some other times it means that you save every penny to make sure that your children don’t inherit your burden of debt.

There is nothing wrong in trying to “maximize money”, but it is important to realize that, depending on your personal situation, there are costs (in terms of stress and time) associated with trying to do that.

Examples are numerous (but vague and difficult to explain) in this area, but a simple one would be to think of a job in which you are paid overtime. Every extra hour you work might mean that you will become richer than the previous hour, but it does not mean that you would be stress-free - or that you would be able to devote enough time to your family. If you overdo it, it wouldn’t be too hard to make yourself and your family feel miserable even with the extra money you earn.

Working your ass off for a few extra bucks might be a good idea when you are a bachelor with hardly any cares in the world, but if you are a family man, then you might be better off by working a little less in lieu of spending a little more time with your family. Now, just because you gave up that little extra money to spend time with your family or to reduce your stress, it does not mean that you are careless or frivolous with your personal finances. In other words, just because you chase every penny, it does not mean that you are an epitome of financially astute people.

In general, for the sake of the betterment of the whole universe and your own self, try optimizing your money instead of maximizing it. It also helps to reevaluate our understanding of “personal finance” in perspective of our changing personal situation and revise our money-chasing efforts accordingly.

Duh!

The “Big Three” automakers Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler, and the United Auto Workers union, traveled to Washington today to ask for a bailout.  They asked collectively for $34 billion, but some estimates suggest that they would actually need almost four times that.  Let’s just say that the banking committee wasn’t whipping out its checkbook.

Whether they actually get the bailout or not doesn’t change the fact that they shouldn’t be getting it in the first place.  Bailouts help the few at the expense of everyone else, and encourage the recipients of the bailouts to come back for more.

A bailout of the auto industry will save a few jobs for a little while.  OK, it will save a lot of jobs for a little while.  But in the long run, a bailout reduces everyone’s standard of living.  It’s interference in the free market, and causes a misallocation of resources.  It’s a misallocation because the market has already given the company the thumbs-down, in that the company has not been able to deliver a product profitably at a price that the market is willing to pay.  A bailout says to the market: “You’re wrong.  This company deserves to stay in business.”

In the absence of a bailout, here’s what would happen to a failing business under free market competition:

1. The common stock investors (if any) lose their investment.  Investors higher up the food chain get only part of their investment back.
2. The assets are sold at fire sale prices, usually to a stronger competitor seeking to increase its market share.  The bidding is competitive.
3. Some, or many, of the workers may not have jobs after the company is acquired.  The ones that do continue to do what they do, perhaps more cheaply.  Others don’t, but they can now enter another field and be productive.
4. The inefficient, inferior company goes away, and the efficient, superior company gets stronger.
5. We all win because the resources have been re-allocated efficiently, as a result of what we, the customers, have already said we want:  less of the failing business’s products, and more of the succeeding business’s products.

When the failing business appeals to the powers that be for a bailout, and it is granted, here’s what happens instead:

1. The failing business stays in business, despite the fact that it doesn’t deliver its product as efficiently as its competitors.
2. The workers keep their jobs, perhaps at above-market wages, despite the fact that this situation is not sustainable by the free market.
3. The people footing the bill (us, mainly) don’t have that money available to us to purchase the products we want.
4. We all lose because the resources have been re-allocated inefficiently by force, against what we, the customers, have already said we want.  We instead get more of the failing business’s products and less of the succeeding business’s products, and have to pay for this situation to boot.

Society functions most efficiently when its members are free to enjoy the fruits of their labor as they please.  From all I can see, society enjoys Toyotas and Hondas more than it enjoys GMs and Fords.  Why should we forced to pay for products we don’t enjoy?

The same is true of things like subsidies, unions, tariffs, import quotas, regulation, price control, and antitrust actions.  All of these things ultimately reduce our standard of living because they interfere with people choosing how to enjoy the fruits of their labors.  John Pugsley’s book The Alpha Strategy explains why these all hurt our standard or living in an exceptionally clear way.  It was written at the end of the Carter administration but the explanation of these phenomena still holds.

I expect we’ll get more of the same, but it will cost us all.  Who’s next in line for a bailout?

There is so much bad news floating around, so much to be worried or angry or upset about in the world. However there is a lot to be grateful for as well, so I thought I would take a moment and count a few blessings. This may be a bit late, considering Thanksgiving was a week ago, but I suppose it is never a bad time to be grateful.

A few quotes on the subject I have read recently:

“Life isn’t fair, but it’s still good.” - Unknown (to me)

“To be grateful is to recognize the love of God in everything He has given us-and He has given us everything.”-Thomas Merton

Now you may not be religious, but that last quote really struck me when I read it. It reminds me to take the bad with the good, and to appreciate it. It might seem wrong or even stupid to try to appreciate what seems unfair, bad, or even evil, but it is possible - and important. We can learn and grow and change for the better as a result of every experience - be it sickness, recession, job loss, or even death.

I once overheard my mother say that having cancer was a huge blessing. I recoiled, but she explained that it brought our family closer together and made her realize her inner strength. Remembering that comment has always kept me in check when I find myself whining or self-pitying.

Things for which I am grateful:

• Having a job and a regular paycheck; not everyone does right now.
• Not having to worry about where I’ll get my next meal or bath.
• Having the means and time to give to others who need support.
• A large family which supports and uplifts me.
• The freedom and ability to learn and pursue whatever I choose.

Many in our country are struggling, some for the first time, as our economy sags and companies lay people off and wages stagnate. Of course we are all still much better off than many in the world, but is still natural and easy to worry, to complain, to be angry and even scared.

But struggles can bring us together, and they can encourage us remember what’s really important - what matters a lot more than the 401k balance or the big bonus check. I hope as this volatile year comes to an end that we can all find some things to be truly grateful for.

More from Meg at The World of Wealth

ShareThis

Essentially, Leasing is just an alternative way to finance a new vehicle. We know that when purchasing a new vehicle the down payment, sales tax and license fees are required to be paid up front. However when leasing a new vehicle you are required to pay only the first monthly payment, a security deposit (usually same as monthly payment), and the license fees. The sales tax (which is based on the capitalized value of the vehicle) is actually amortized over the term of the lease in most states. In other words, the taxes are included in the monthly payments.

Capitalized Cost

Essentially the capitalized cost of a new vehicle is the actual price you have agreed to pay for the vehicle.

Gross Capitalized Cost

The gross capitalized cost of a new vehicle includes the selling price of the vehicle (which is the capitalized cost plus acquisition fees, extended warranty, accident & health insurance, dealer title fee, payoff on your trade-in, credit life insurance, gap insurance and any other fees the dealer decides to charge you). Buyer beware; that most people really don't ever know what their capitalized cost is because it is buried within the gross capitalized cost and the dealer doesn't actually reveal this number unless he has to. Most car deals made at auto dealerships are negotiated on the basis of payment rather than price. This applies to both leasing and purchasing. Don't get caught in this trap! Make the dealer reveal the selling price for every payment offer he makes you!

Adjusted Capitalized Cost

The adjusted capitalized cost of a new vehicle is the gross capitalized cost minus (-) your down payment, net trade-in amount, rebates, license fees and taxes along with any other deductions given.

Depreciation/Residual

When purchasing a new vehicle your payments are based on the full value or selling price, plus extended warranty, tax & license, minus (-) rebate, down payment and net trade-in value. However, when you lease a vehicle your payments are based only on the "depreciation or your use" of the vehicle during the entire term of the lease. The depreciation is actually only a portion of the capitalized cost of the vehicle and is determined by the term of the lease, number of miles driven and condition of the vehicle at the end of the lease. The payments on a lease are based on the deprecation money factor (which is a form of interest rate) and the amortized taxes. Therefore, you can actually drive a more expensive vehicle with a lower payment if you lease. Please note that the depreciation is actually estimated and set at the inception of the lease.

The residual is the portion or balance of the adjusted capitalized cost after the deprecation has been deducted. The residual is just put aside in limbo until the end of the lease. The higher the residual - the lower your monthly payment. At the end of the lease you have two options. You can either turn the vehicle back into the bank or leasing company, or you can buy the vehicle outright for the residual balance. You can even refinance the residual. But keep in mind if you turn in the vehicle with more mileage than allowed on your contract, you will be charged any where from .12¢ to .25¢ for each extra mile. In an auto lease you are limited to a specific number of miles in your lease contact. The average would be from 12,000 to 15,000 miles per year. You may drive any number of miles in any given year but you cannot exceed the number of allotted miles or you will be penalized. If you purchase the vehicle the charge for the extra mileage will normally be waved. Most banks and finance companies will allow you to add an extra 15,000 to 20,000 miles to your lease contract depending on the term of the lease. However, the cost of the extra miles will be added to your gross capitalization cost and your monthly payment will be increased accordingly.

Ownership

When you have entered into a lease contract you cannot terminate the lease or turn-in your vehicle prior to the ending date of the contract. If you do this the bank will report this as a voluntary repossession on your credit record. On an auto lease the vehicle is actually registered and titled to the bank or leasing company. Therefore you do not own the vehicle, the bank does. You get to use the vehicle and are legally responsible for the upkeep and maintenance. Please note, if you don't maintain the vehicle during the lease you will be penalized for all excessive wear-and-tear when you turn it in. Also, if you really needed to get out of your lease you can buy out of the lease if you can get the financing or you can get someone to take over your lease. Of course, they will have to qualify.

Vehicle Warranties

The average new car warranty is 36 months or 36000 miles, which ever comes first. It is not recommended that you enter into a 4, 5 or 6 year lease contract because they are not economical. Even with a four-year lease it is common for the residual to be higher than the actual value of the vehicle at the end of the lease which makes it very hard to refinance. If you are like a lot of people you can lease a new vehicle every 2 to 3 years and never have to buy an extended warranty. The only time it would be beneficial to buy an extended warranty is if you knew you were going to buy the vehicle outright at the end of the lease.

Gap Insurance

Gap Insurance is basically insurance coverage on the difference between the actual value of your vehicle and the balance you owe on the lease including the residual. This kind of protection is needed in case your vehicle is involved in an accident and is declared a total loss. Gap Insurance is important especially for people who lease vehicles. The lease on a vehicle is actually designed for the balance owed to be upside-down in relation to the actual value of the vehicle until approximately the end date of the lease term. At this time the residual should fall in line or be equal to the vehicle's actual value. Gap Insurance is good for purchase financing as well. The gap is not as large as in leasing, but you still stand the chance of having to put out a great deal of money.

Final Advice

Remember, there are two main factors you must consider when you are thinking about leasing an automobile. The first is how long you intend to keep the vehicle and the second is how many miles you travel annually. If you intend to keep the vehicle a maximum of three years and you only average 15,000 miles a year, then you should definitely consider leasing. If you want to keep the new vehicle for more than three years, you should consider purchasing.

When you lease a vehicle, you very rarely have to put any money down, so lease a new vehicle every two to three years and you won't owe any money on the old vehicle, plus you'll never have to buy an extended warranty. Also, you will have spent a ton of money less for each vehicle than if you had purchased them. If you want to keep a vehicle longer just buy it at the end of the lease.

Remember, don't let the dealer try to sell you on the basis of payments. Negotiate on the price only and when you have agreed on the price then tell them you have a trade-in. When you have agreed to your trade-in value then tell them you want to lease the new vehicle. Now you know what to do from here. Also, dealerships have a tendency to quote lease payments without the monthly tax. This makes a big difference in the monthly payments. If you don't control this you will be sadly surprised when you go into the finance manager to sign the paperwork. One more thing - when you are signing the lease contract, be sure to verify that the trade-in value you have agreed upon is actually deducted from the capitalized cost. Otherwise the dealer could wind up purchasing your trade for pennies and you would never know.

Visit My site http://www.autopurchasesecrets.com for more free information on the secrets the dealerships don't want you to know.

About the Author

Brad spent thirteen years in the Automobile business, specifically auto sales and worked for several Dealerships. He held positions from Retail Salesman up through New Car Manager and Fleet Manager. During this period Brad received an excellent education on what goes on inside the Automobile Dealerships. You can visit and communicate with Brad at his website http://www.autopurchasese

Tomorrow is Independence Day in the United States, a time for friends and family to gather and enjoy the early summer. I’m taking a l-o-n-g weekend, and won’t return until Monday. If I’m lucky, I’ll get a chance to play in the sprinkler.

In the meantime, I thought it would be fun to devote a thread to financial success stories. People send me e-mail all the time to say how they’ve taken control of their personal finances. I love to read these tales, and I know that other people do, too. (We even have a section of the forums devoted to them.)

For example, here’s what one long-time reader wrote a few weeks ago:

I paid off a credit card today!  At times its balance had been as high as $12K, but with the severance pay from my old job, signing bonus from new job, and various other resources, I paid it off completely today.  

The next step is to move the existing balance on my other credit card (about $8K) onto the now-zeroed card at a low balance transfer rate, and then pay down that last balance. It feels really good to have this thing off my back after so long.

Do you have a financial success story to share? Big or small, it doesn’t matter. Tell us about it! You have all weekend to do so. Have a safe and happy fourth, everybody…

---
Related Articles at Get Rich Slowly:

• My Paycheck is Late Again
• Win a Free Consultation with a Financial Planner
• GRS Reader Success Stories
• Daily Roundup: Contest Edition
• When the Going Gets Tough, Get Back to the Basics

In my mind, Ben Stein will always best be remembered as the teacher from the classic 80’s movie “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off”.

But beyond his acting career, Ben Stein is a lawyer, economist and former presidential speech writer. He’s a smart guy and a good writer. I don’t always agree with his conclusions, but I think he nails it in his latest piece.

In his latest writing — an article in the New York Times — he asks, “Where Are the Grown-Ups When You Need Them?”

This is a great article which tells it like it is. Click here to read it.

Share This

The bill specifies 10 key provisions that are designed to structure and regulate the claims process to an even more stringent degree. However, the bill requires business owners to be more involved in employee claims or risk incurring substantial fines and litigation.

Therefore, while the SB 899 has the potential to provide significant cost-reduction options, employers need to drive the process and remain involved in the handling of employee claims to benefit from these savings.

The following key points are areas of the bill specifically designed to reduce claims costs.

2. Attorneys for injured workers do not get to select doctors for treatment or evaluation of injuries, if the employer has a comprehensive medical network available for care of injured employees.

4. Temporary disability payments are limited to 2 years in most cases, down from 5 years previously.

6. Utilization review guidelines are strengthened, specifically defining what constitutes ?medically necessary? treatment.

The following points could result in an increase in employer operational costs.

2. Disability awards are increased by 15% if modified work is not offered.

1. Effective 1/1/2005, a medical provider network should be created and active.

3. Review and update the ?carve out? portion of your Collective Bargaining Agreement.

If a claim has already been filed, the following steps should be implemented:

2. Each injured employee should submit an accident statement directly after the injury has occurred.

4. After the employee has been examined, diagnosed and approved to return to work, the employer should submit a written offer of return to work.

Failure was not an option. The government finally stepped in on Sunday and unveiled plans to take over troubled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, putting to rest fears that the two firms would collapse and send the housing market into a death spiral.

The housing market breathed a sigh of relief – but no cheers from the stockholders of the two firms. Fannie Mae [FNM] was trading at around $7.00 towards the end of last week and immediately collapsed to about a buck on news of the announcement. As of close today it’s hovering around $0.74.

For investors Fannie and Freddie have seemed like a pretty safe play for years. Stodgy, even. A publically traded pseudo-government entity which was crucial to the U.S. economy and backed by government guarantees seemed like a pretty safe place to stash away some cash that you didn’t want invested in risky stuff; let the day-traders mess with the bio-techs and dot.coms.

But what a difference a week makes.

A lot of investors took a bath on this one. We’re still in the shadow of Enron, WorldCom, Quest, Tyco, and others – but I never cease to be amazed when I speak to folks who have large percentages of their net worth tied up in a single stock. Sometimes it’s because it’s a “safe bet”, or because they’re comfortable and haven’t bothered to rebalance. But most often it’s because they work for the company in question.

This isn’t smart behavior. Real estate investors understand that there is no reward without risk, but diversification is the way that smart, tactical investors hedge their bets. Anything else is just gambling.

Contrast this to the advice that millions of Americans swallow then they read what is undoubtedly the worst personal finance book ever: Robert Kiyosaki’s Rich Dad Poor Dad. Diversification, according to get-rich-guru Kiyosaki, is for suckers. “Put a lot of your eggs in a few baskets,” he exhorts. “Do not do what poor and middle class people do: put their few eggs in many baskets.” A balanced portfolio “…is not the way that successful investors play the game.” These are quotes from the book; I’m not making this stuff up. The biggest problem with Rich Dad Poor Dad is not that it’s filled with vague motivational psycho-babble; it’s that hidden in the self-help hucksterism there are gems like this that are actually dangerous.

Kiyosaki is undoubtedly a smart businessman and has made millions of dollars selling his books and courses, but I’d encourage his true believers out there to take a critical look at some of the ideas that he’s promoting.

Related:

• Why I don't like Rich Dad Poor Dad
• The Black Swan :: The highly improbable and real estate
• Another bailout on the horizon?  Fannie and Freddie

Add this to my list of last minute gift ideas: a couple of Restaurant.com discount deals and coupons to give you up to 80% off the gift certificates you purchase.

How about some good news for a change? I know my wallet needs a break from the never-ending drama in the financial markets, but just in time for the holidays, here are some pretty decent offers that make for some great gifts.

Watch this space for the latest Restaurant.com deals and coupons you can use!

Restaurant.com Discount Deals and Coupons

Newest Deal: 70% Off + $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com only at Restaurant.com

Description: Now you can save 70% Off + $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com when you try the new coupon code “THANKS”. It can be used on both of Restaurant.com’s most popular products, Dinner of the Month Club and the $25 Gift Certificates. This offer is now valid through November 30th!

Where To Order:

• 70% off Dinner of the Month Club and get $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com! Use the code THANKS. Valid 11/25 thru 11/30/08.
• 70% off $25 Gift Certificates and $10 off a $75 purchase at Wine.com! Use code THANKS and pay $3 only, for each $25 gift certificate. Valid 11/25/08 thru 11/30/08.

Gift Certificates

Restaurant.com has a couple of things they sell — they have $25 gift certificates that are normally sold for $10 each. That’s the usual price. But you can use promotional coupons as we’ve listed above, to receive even better prices for your gift certificates.

Now with their current promotion going on, you can get those $10 certificates (with the $25 dinner value) for 80% off. They’re now going for $2 if you use the PROMO CODE: SURPRISE and visit this link. This offer will be valid through November 24.

A very important caveat that you must be aware of and which I just double-checked: I’ve looked into the eligible restaurants where certificates can be applied, and the ones I’ve seen require a minimum spending amount at the restaurant. Please check your region for requirements on how the certificates can be used.

Dinner of the Month Club

Similarly, when Restaurant.com does a Dinner of the Month Club promotion, they give you a discount on already great prices on their Dinner of the Month Club program. Here’s an example of how their promotional discounts work.

Let’s say they give you an 80% off coupon deal on their program, which offers you 3, 6, or 12 month’s worth of gift certificates plus some bonus free gift certificates if you subscribe to this. Here is how the programs will be priced (again, this is just an illustration of the value savings you can get by using the coupons):

For the particular case of 80% off discounts on the gift certificates, if you order 3 months’ worth of gift certificates through “Dinner of the Month Club”, you get certificates valued at $75 that can be applied to any of your favorite restaurants on the Restaurant.com list. The price for those 3 month certificates will only be $6 PLUS you’ll get another $10 gift certificate for FREE. That is, your $6 will buy you $85 worth of gift certificates. By the same token, for $12, you’ll get gift certificates totaling up to $175; and for $24, you’ll receive gift certificates worth $350. Wooh, not bad! Note that the certificates are made available once per month from the time you make the purchase.

By using this link, you’ll get the 80% discount offer AND bonus freebies when you sign up. You’ll need to use the PROMO CODE: SURPRISE, which lasts through November 24.

For details on how to purchase, gift and redeem your certificates, just check the Help/FAQ section. What’s nice is that if you do use these as gifts, your recipient will only see their options for redeeming (and restaurants to choose from) but won’t see how much you’ve spent. These certificates will be good for a year from the date of purchase, but there can be special terms depending on which state you reside in, so just check their terms and conditions for additional details.

One last note: Restaurant.com does these deals quite often. When an offer like this expires, it doesn’t take long before they come up with a new promotion. But discounts range between 60% to 80% off and are given out periodically, but you just don’t know when they’ll be available. For the latest, current deals, please refer to our announcement at the beginning of this post for details.

This is a post from The Digerati Life.

Bookmark It